arrow left
arrow right
  • BURTON,NANCY v. MASON,DAVID PHILIPM00 - Misc - Injunction document preview
  • BURTON,NANCY v. MASON,DAVID PHILIPM00 - Misc - Injunction document preview
  • BURTON,NANCY v. MASON,DAVID PHILIPM00 - Misc - Injunction document preview
  • BURTON,NANCY v. MASON,DAVID PHILIPM00 - Misc - Injunction document preview
  • BURTON,NANCY v. MASON,DAVID PHILIPM00 - Misc - Injunction document preview
  • BURTON,NANCY v. MASON,DAVID PHILIPM00 - Misc - Injunction document preview
						
                                

Preview

X06-UWY-CV-21-5028294 S NANCY BURTON SUPERIOR COURT Vv. JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY DAVID PHILIP MASON ETAL. MARCH 28, 2023 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTIONS FOR REARGUMENT NUNC PRO TUNC Plaintiff moves for an extension of time to file her motions for reargument nunc pro tunc of the decision of the trial court (Bellis, J.) granting Defendants Carmody, Gibbons and Mason’s motions for judgment. An extension of time nunc pro tunc is warranted in this matter. During the course of these proceedings, Plaintiff has suffered from a variety of emergency and debilitating health conditions, including blindness in one eye, four emergency eye surgeries, and most recently a sudden vascular condition causing painful swelling and limiting mobility. Plaintiff has been put on a medical regime of a variety of medications which cause extreme fatigue, nausea and general physical distress. With her near-vision compromised, she is unable to carry our legal research and writing without significant delay. Thus, although this filing may appear to be relatively free of typographical and other errors, its production has been slow, painstaking and laborious. Plaintiff is prone to severe eyestrain and headaches which limit her productivity. The stresses of this and related litigation have recently been exacerbated when recently, without prior notice or permission on her part, and in her absence, the Town of Redding, a defendant herein, with others, willfully trespassed on Plaintiff's property, caused property damage and carried out exceptionally harmful cutting of her mature and majestic historic trees on false premises (Cross Highway, Plaintiff's place of residence, is a municipally-designated scenic road where trees are protected by law from such deliberate damage). As a consequence, Plaintiff has had to suspend all other activities, including work on this litigation, to address this emergency. (The tree damage was done, not in the course of a safety-related exercise, but simply to make it easier for telephone company workers to install fiber optic cables. (The Redding Tree Warden . confirmed that the damages trees are on Plaintiff's private property and not subject of any governmental right-of-way.) Given these unique circumstances, this motion should be granted and justice thereby served. THE PLAINTIF — fancy Burt Highway Redding CT 06896 Tel. 203-313-1510 NancyBurtonCT@aol.com CERTIFICATION This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was delivered electronically on March 28, 2023 to all counsel of record as below: Michael D. Riseberg, Esq. Christine N. Parise, Esq. Daniel B. Stanhill, Esq. Rubin and Rudman LLP 53 State Street, 15" Floor Boston MA 02109 Tel. 617-330-7000 mriseberg@rubinrudman.com cparise@ribinrudman.com dstanhill cubinrudman.com Matthew Levine, Esq! Jonathan Harding, Esq. 231 Capitol Ave. Hartford CT 06106 Matthew.Levine@ct.go' Jonathan. Harding@ct.gov James N. Tallberg, Esq. Kimberly A. Bosse, Esq. Karsten & Tallberg, LLC 500 Enterprise Drive Suite 4B Rocky Hill CT 006067 Tel. 860-233-5600 jtallberg@kt-lawfirm.com kbosse@kt-lawfirm.com Philip T. Newbury, Jr., Esq. Howd & Ludorf, LLC 65 Wethersfield Ave. Hartford CT 06114-1121 Tel. 860-249-1361 pnewbury@hl-law.com Steven Stafstrom, Esq. Alexander W. Ahrens, Esq. Pullman Comley, LLC Melick & Porter, LLP 850 Main Street 900 Main Street South. Bridgeport T 06601 Southbury CT 06488 SStafstrom@pullcom.com aahrens@melicklaw.com G2 _-