arrow left
arrow right
  • DISASTER PROTECH, INC. VS ALEX ZAPATA Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • DISASTER PROTECH, INC. VS ALEX ZAPATA Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/20/2019 06:20 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Galicia, Deputy Clerk CM-110 ‘ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) 49457 FOR COURT USE ONLY OLIVIA O. BISSELL BISSELL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 15701 Sherman Way, #7114, Van Nuys, CA 91409 TELEPHONE NO: (951) 746-3801 FAX NO. (Optona): (310) 300-0714 E-MAIL ADORESS (Optiona): Oliviabissell@gmail.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name: Plaintiff DISASTER PROTECH, INC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES street aopress: 111 N. Hill Street ILING ADDRESS: City AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse - Central District PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: DISASTER PROTECH, INC DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: ALEX ZAPATA CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): (2) untimitep cAsE [5 tumitep case 19STCV16820 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: October 7, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 38 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): [—) Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): a. (1 This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff DISASTER PROTECH, INC b. [] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a The complaint was filed on (date): May 14, 2019 b. [1] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. LZ] Allparties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [_] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) [have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) [1 have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. CJ) The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): Description of case a. Type of case in complaint [1 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): 1) BREACH OF CONTRACT; 2) WORK, LABOR AND SERVICES; AND 3) UNJUST ENRICHMENT Page 1 of § Form Adopted for Mandati oniory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Ce 31 of Calif ‘ules 3.720-3.730 ‘CM-110 (Rev. July 1, 2011] www courts.ca.gov