On May 14, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Disaster Protech Inc.,
Zapata Alex,
and
Montes Felix,
Zapata Alex,
for Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/20/2019 06:20 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Galicia, Deputy Clerk
CM-110
‘ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) 49457 FOR COURT USE ONLY
OLIVIA O. BISSELL
BISSELL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
15701 Sherman Way, #7114, Van Nuys, CA 91409
TELEPHONE NO: (951) 746-3801 FAX NO. (Optona): (310) 300-0714
E-MAIL ADORESS (Optiona): Oliviabissell@gmail.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name: Plaintiff DISASTER PROTECH, INC
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
street aopress: 111 N. Hill Street
ILING ADDRESS:
City AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse - Central District
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: DISASTER PROTECH, INC
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: ALEX ZAPATA
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): (2) untimitep cAsE [5 tumitep case 19STCV16820
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: October 7, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 38 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[—) Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a. (1 This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff DISASTER PROTECH, INC
b. [] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a The complaint was filed on (date): May 14, 2019
b. [1] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. LZ] Allparties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. [_] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) [have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [1 have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. CJ) The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint [1 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
1) BREACH OF CONTRACT; 2) WORK, LABOR AND SERVICES; AND 3) UNJUST ENRICHMENT
Page 1 of §
Form Adopted for Mandati oniory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Ce 31 of Calif ‘ules 3.720-3.730
‘CM-110 (Rev. July 1, 2011] www courts.ca.gov
Category
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial within 60 days of ADR 07/13/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.