On September 24, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Dominguez Damian,
and
Does 1 Through 25,
Lake Lindero Homeowner'S Association Inc.,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/13/2020 02:02 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stale Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Aaron Gundzik (SBN 132137) Rebecca Gundzik (138446)
GUNDZIK GUNDZIK HEEGER LLP
14011 Ventura Blvd., Suite 206E
Sherman Oaks, CA 91423
TELEPHONE NO.: 818-290-7461 FAX NO. (Optional): 818-918-2316
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): aaron.gundzik@gghllp.com, rebecca.gundzik@gghllp.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff Damian Dominguez
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
c1TY AND z1P cone Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Damian Dominguez
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Lake Lindero Homeowner'sAssociation, Inc.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
19STCV33951
(Check one): 0 UNLIMITED CASE O LIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: March 2, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 48 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
@ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Aaron Gundzik
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. 0 This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff Damian Dominguez
b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): September 24, 2019
b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. [TI All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in II] complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Unlimited civil complaint for failure to pay overtime premium, failure to provide meal and rest breaks, inaccurate wage
statements, failure to pay unpaid wages at time of discharge, failure to maintain time records and for recovery of civil penalties
under PAGA.
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720-3.730
CM-110 IRev. July 1, 2011) www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
February 13, 2020
Case Filing Date
September 24, 2019
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 03/15/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.