arrow left
arrow right
  • DAMIAN DOMINGUEZ VS LAKE LINDERO HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • DAMIAN DOMINGUEZ VS LAKE LINDERO HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/13/2020 02:02 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stale Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Aaron Gundzik (SBN 132137) Rebecca Gundzik (138446) GUNDZIK GUNDZIK HEEGER LLP 14011 Ventura Blvd., Suite 206E Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 TELEPHONE NO.: 818-290-7461 FAX NO. (Optional): 818-918-2316 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): aaron.gundzik@gghllp.com, rebecca.gundzik@gghllp.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff Damian Dominguez SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: c1TY AND z1P cone Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Damian Dominguez DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Lake Lindero Homeowner'sAssociation, Inc. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: 19STCV33951 (Check one): 0 UNLIMITED CASE O LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: March 2, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 48 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): @ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Aaron Gundzik INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. 0 This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff Damian Dominguez b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): September 24, 2019 b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. [TI All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in II] complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Unlimited civil complaint for failure to pay overtime premium, failure to provide meal and rest breaks, inaccurate wage statements, failure to pay unpaid wages at time of discharge, failure to maintain time records and for recovery of civil penalties under PAGA. Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720-3.730 CM-110 IRev. July 1, 2011) www.courts.ca.gov