On October 15, 2019 a
Miscellaneous
was filed
involving a dispute between
Penman Elsa,
and
Cemex Construction Materials Pacific Llc,
Cemex Inc,
Nunez Robert,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/15/2019 12:00 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Barel,Deputy Clerk
19STCV36593
CM4)f 0
ATTORNEY oR pAR TY lfu THoU 7 AT TURNE Y /ms me sfafe sa num sar and admessf. FOR COURT USE OHS 7
Jeremy D. Scherwin (SBN 274532)
Scherwin Law Firm
1055 W. 7th Street, Ph 33
Los Angeles, CA 900) 7
TETEPHONE Nou $213) 297-8777 Fnxuo (213) 318-0512
ATToRNEY FGR /H~/ Eisa I'enman
suPERioR coURT oF cALIFCRNIA, coUNTY QF Los Angeles
BTREETACOREBE 111 N. Hill Street
MAIUNGAOCREBB I I 1 IYI, Hill Street
clTY ANO 2/P cooE Los Angeles 90012
BRANOH NAME'tanley Mosk
CASE NAME:
Penman v. Cemex, jnc., et al.
CASE NUMBER
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation
2j Unlimited
(Amount
H
Limited
(Amount E3 Counter Jolniter O
demanded demanded is Filed with first appearance by defendant
exceeds $ 25,000) $ 25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) osl'T
Items 1-6 below must be completed {see instructions on page 2).
1. Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case:
Auto Tort Contract provlslonaay Complex Clvg Litigation
AUIG (22) Breach of contract/warranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.480-3.403)
Uninsured motorist (46) Rule 3.740 coseclions (09) C3 Antitrust/Trade regulation (03)
Other pl/pD/WD (personal Injwy/property Other collections (09) Construction defect (10)
Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort Insurance Ixlversge (18) Mass tort (40)
Asbestos (04) Other contract {37) Securities litigation (28)
Product liability (24) Real Property C3 Envlronmentsl/Toxic tort (30}
Medical mslpradice (45) Eminent domain/Inverse M Insurance coverage daims arising from the
Other PI/Pn/WO (23)
Non-PI/PD/WD (Other) Tort
M Business tort/unfsir business pradice (07)
~
condemnation (14)
Wrongful eviction (33)
Other reel property (26)
above listed provisionssy complex case
types (41)
Enforcement of Judgment
Civil rights (08) nlawful Detainer Enforcemenl of judgment (20)
Defamation (13) Cl Commercial (31) allscellaneous Civil Complaint
M Fraud(16) Cl Residential (32) RICO {27}
Intellectual properly (19) Cl Drugs (38) E3 Other complaint (Rot Specified above) (42)
C3
Professional negligence (25} Judlc 1st Review Mlsceaaneous Civil Petition
Asset forfeiture (05)
Other non-Pl/PDIWD tort (35) C3
Em loyment C3 Petition re: arbitration award (11)
~ Partnership and corporate govemsnce {21)
Other petition (nol spec/Eed above) (43)
Wrongful termination (36)
Other employment (15)
2. This case is M
LJ exceptional
is not
o Writ of mandate (02)
Olhar judicial review (39)
complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the
factors requiring judicial management:
a. M Large number of separately represented parties d. Large number of witnesses
b. Cj Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e. C]
Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts
issues that will be time-fxynsuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court
c. C3 Substantial amount of documentary evidence f. C]
Substantial postjudgment judicial supervision
3. Remedies sought {check all that apply): monetary b. a.~ M
nonmonetary; dectamtory or injunctive relief c. Qjpunitive
4. Number of causes of action (specify): 7
5. This case is H C/1 is not a class action suit.
6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related ca (you may Use CM-015.)
Date: 10/13/2019
Jeremy D. Scherwin
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME} 'l(SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY)
NOTICE
~ Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the grat paper liled in the action or pro edi (except small daims cases or cases filed
under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. ule of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result
in sanctions.
~ File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule.
~ If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on ag
other parties to the action or proceeding.
~ Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes onlv.
Pslnl I of 2
Form Adopted lof Mandslmy Use Csl. Rides of Coufl, ndss 2 30, 3 220. 3 4003403, 3 740,
Judicl8l Couflol of Csvoffu8 CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET CSI. Slmld88IS Of Judnus AdnunelfSuml, Sld 3.10
CMOI0 IReu. July 1. 2MTI ww lunlflmfo os dos
Document Filed Date
October 15, 2019
Case Filing Date
October 15, 2019
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 06/03/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/15/2019 12:00 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Barel,Deputy Clerk 19STCV36593 CM4)f 0 ATTORNEY oR pAR TY lfu THoU 7 AT TURNE Y /ms me sfafe sa num sar and admessf. FOR COURT USE OHS 7 Jeremy D. Scherwin (SBN 274532) Scherwin Law Firm 1055 W. 7th Street, Ph 33 Los Angeles, CA 900) 7 TETEPHONE Nou $213) 297-8777 Fnxuo (213) 318-0512 ATToRNEY FGR /H~/ Eisa I'enman suPERioR coURT oF cALIFCRNIA, coUNTY QF Los Angeles BTREETACOREBE 111 N. Hill Street MAIUNGAOCREBB I I 1 IYI, Hill Street clTY ANO 2/P cooE Los Angeles 90012 BRANOH NAME'tanley Mosk CASE NAME: Penman v. Cemex, jnc., et al. CASE NUMBER CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation 2j Unlimited (Amount H Limited (Amount E3 Counter Jolniter O demanded demanded is Filed with first appearance by defendant exceeds $ 25,000) $ 25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) osl'T Items 1-6 below must be completed {see instructions on page 2). 1. Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case: Auto Tort Contract provlslonaay Complex Clvg Litigation AUIG (22) Breach of contract/warranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.480-3.403) Uninsured motorist (46) Rule 3.740 coseclions (09) C3 Antitrust/Trade regulation (03) Other pl/pD/WD (personal Injwy/property Other collections (09) Construction defect (10) Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort Insurance Ixlversge (18) Mass tort (40) Asbestos (04) Other contract {37) Securities litigation (28) Product liability (24) Real Property C3 Envlronmentsl/Toxic tort (30} Medical mslpradice (45) Eminent domain/Inverse M Insurance coverage daims arising from the Other PI/Pn/WO (23) Non-PI/PD/WD (Other) Tort M Business tort/unfsir business pradice (07) ~ condemnation (14) Wrongful eviction (33) Other reel property (26) above listed provisionssy complex case types (41) Enforcement of Judgment Civil rights (08) nlawful Detainer Enforcemenl of judgment (20) Defamation (13) Cl Commercial (31) allscellaneous Civil Complaint M Fraud(16) Cl Residential (32) RICO {27} Intellectual properly (19) Cl Drugs (38) E3 Other complaint (Rot Specified above) (42) C3 Professional negligence (25} Judlc 1st Review Mlsceaaneous Civil Petition Asset forfeiture (05) Other non-Pl/PDIWD tort (35) C3 Em loyment C3 Petition re: arbitration award (11) ~ Partnership and corporate govemsnce {21) Other petition (nol spec/Eed above) (43) Wrongful termination (36) Other employment (15) 2. This case is M LJ exceptional is not o Writ of mandate (02) Olhar judicial review (39) complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the factors requiring judicial management: a. M Large number of separately represented parties d. Large number of witnesses b. Cj Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e. C] Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts issues that will be time-fxynsuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court c. C3 Substantial amount of documentary evidence f. C] Substantial postjudgment judicial supervision 3. Remedies sought {check all that apply): monetary b. a.~ M nonmonetary; dectamtory or injunctive relief c. Qjpunitive 4. Number of causes of action (specify): 7 5. This case is H C/1 is not a class action suit. 6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related ca (you may Use CM-015.) Date: 10/13/2019 Jeremy D. Scherwin (TYPE OR PRINT NAME} 'l(SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY) NOTICE ~ Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the grat paper liled in the action or pro edi (except small daims cases or cases filed under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. ule of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result in sanctions. ~ File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule. ~ If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on ag other parties to the action or proceeding. ~ Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes onlv. Pslnl I of 2 Form Adopted lof Mandslmy Use Csl. Rides of Coufl, ndss 2 30, 3 220. 3 4003403, 3 740, Judicl8l Couflol of Csvoffu8 CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET CSI. Slmld88IS Of Judnus AdnunelfSuml, Sld 3.10 CMOI0 IReu. July 1. 2MTI ww lunlflmfo os dos