arrow left
arrow right
  • Elizabeth Grady Face First, Inc. D/B/A The Elizabeth Grady Company vs. Cynosure, Inc. et al Fraud, Business Torts, etc. document preview
  • Elizabeth Grady Face First, Inc. D/B/A The Elizabeth Grady Company vs. Cynosure, Inc. et al Fraud, Business Torts, etc. document preview
  • Elizabeth Grady Face First, Inc. D/B/A The Elizabeth Grady Company vs. Cynosure, Inc. et al Fraud, Business Torts, etc. document preview
  • Elizabeth Grady Face First, Inc. D/B/A The Elizabeth Grady Company vs. Cynosure, Inc. et al Fraud, Business Torts, etc. document preview
  • Elizabeth Grady Face First, Inc. D/B/A The Elizabeth Grady Company vs. Cynosure, Inc. et al Fraud, Business Torts, etc. document preview
  • Elizabeth Grady Face First, Inc. D/B/A The Elizabeth Grady Company vs. Cynosure, Inc. et al Fraud, Business Torts, etc. document preview
						
                                

Preview

31 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS MIDDLESEX, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT ELIZABETH GRADY FACE FIRST INC. RECEIVED D/B/A THE ELIZABETH GRADY 1/18/2022 COMPANY, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2081-CV-02967 V. CYNOSURE, INC., and KEVIN THORNAL, Defendants. DEFENDANT CYNOSURE, LLC’S ASSENTED-TO MOTION TO EXTEND ITS DEADLINE FOR RESPONDING TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant Cynosure, LLC (“Cynosure”) respectfully moves this Court pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. 6(b) to extend its deadline for responding to plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by two weeks, until February 1, 2022. Plaintiff has assented to this Motion. Pursuant to a docket entry dated January 3, 2022 and notices mailed that same date, the parties were advised of a decision by the Court dated December 31, 2021 denying Cynosure’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Based on the date that notice was transmitted, Cynosure’s deadline for responding to the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(2) and Mass. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d) and (e) is January 18, 2022. Through this assented-to Motion, which Cynosure is filing before expiration of the prescribed time period, Cynosure respectfully requests a two-week extension in its responsive deadline. As grounds, Cynosure states that although it has worked diligently to prepare its Ic response within the abbreviated 10-day time period that applies following decisions on Rule 12 motions, it requires a short extension until February 1 to complete the response. Dated: January 18, 2022 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michael J. Pineault Michael J. Pineault (BBO No. 555314) ANDERSON & KREIGER LLP 50 Milk Street, 21st Floor Boston, MA 02109 mpineault@andersonkreiger.com T: +1 617.621.6578 F: +1 617.621.6619 Jocelyn A. Wiesner (pro hac vice) ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP 601 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20001 daniel.pariser@arnoldporter.com jocelyn. wiesner@arnoldporter.com T: +1 202.942.5000 F: +1 202.942.5999 Counsel for Defendant Cynosure, LLC CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH SUPERIOR COURT RULE 9C The undersigned counsel certifies pursuant to Superior Court Rule 9C that counsel for Cynosure contacted, sought and obtained the assent of counsel for Plaintiff to this Motion. /s/ Michael J. Pineault Michael J. Pineault CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true copy of the above pleading was served upon the following counsel of record for the parties by e-mail and by first class mail on January 18, 2022: William A. Zucker (BBO No. 541230) Nicholas W. Allen (BBO No. 663409) McCarTER & ENGLISH, LLP 265 Franklin Street, Boston, MA 02110-3113 T: +1 617.449.6500 wzucker@mecarter.com nallen@mecarter.com Counsel for Plaintiff Daniel Patrick Tighe, Esq. (BBO No. 556583) Peter Erich Gelhaar, Esq. (BBO No. 188310) DONNELLY, CONROY & GELHAAR, LLP 260 Franklin Street, Suite 1600 Boston, MA 02110 T: +1 617.720.2880 dpt@dcglaw.com peg@dcglaw.com Counsel for Defendant Kevin Thornal /s/ Michael J. Pineault Michael J. Pineault