On October 22, 2019 a
Miscellaneous
was filed
involving a dispute between
Vega Martin,
and
Banuelos Kevin,
Prevalent Logistics Inc. A California Corporation,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/22/2019 05:51 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by H. Flores-Hernandez,Deputy Clerk
19STCV38155
CM..010
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY '{fame, state Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
r- Sarkis Sirmabekian fSBN 2785 81
SIRMABEKIAN LAW FIRM, PC
3435 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1710
Los An,e;eles, California, 90010
TELEPHONE NO.: 818.473.5003 FAXNO.: : 818.476.5619
ATTORNEY FOR (Name):Plaintiff Martin Ve_ga
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los An_geles
sTREET ADDREss: 111 N. Hill Street
MAILING ADDREss: 111 N. Hill Street
CITY AND ZIP CODE: LOS Angeles 90012
BRANcH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
CASE NAME:
Martin Vega v. Prevalent Logistics Inc., et al.
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET CASE NUMBER:
Complex Case Designation
0 Unlimited D
Limited
D
Counter D
Joinder
(Amount (Amount JUDGE:
demanded demanded is Filed with first appearance by defendant
exceeds $25,000) $25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) DEPT:
Items 1-6 below must be completed (see mstructtons on page 2).
1. Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case:
Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation
D Auto (22) D
Breach of contract/warranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.406-3.403)
D Uninsured motorist (46) D
Rule 3.740 collections (09) D
Antitrust/Trade regulation (03)
Other PI/PDIWD {Personal Injury/Property D
Other collections (09) D
Construction defect (1 0)
Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort D
Insurance coverage (18) Mass tort (40) D
D Asbestos (04) D
Other contract (37) D
Securities litigation (28)
D Product liability (24) Real Property D
Environmental/Toxic tort (30)
D Medical malpractice (45) D
Eminent domain/Inverse D
Insurance coverage claims arising from the
D Other PI/PD/WD (23) condemnation (14) above listed provisionally complex case
Non-PI/PDIWD (Other) Tort D
Wrongful eviction (33) types (41)
D Business tort/unfair business practice (07) D
Other real property (26) Enforcement of Judgment
D Civil rights (08) Unlawful Detainer D
Enforcement of judgment (20)
D Defamation (13) D
Commercial (31) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint
D Fraud (16) D
Residential (32) RIC0(27) D
D Intellectual property (19) D
Drugs (38) D
Other complaint (not specified above) (42)
D Professional negligence (25) Judicial Review Miscellaneous Civil Petition
D Other non-PIIPD/WD tort (35) D
Asset forfeiture (05) D
Partnership and corporate governance (21)
Employment D
Petition re: arbitration award (11) D
Other petition (not specified above) (43)
D Wrongful termination (36) D
Writ of mandate (02)
0 Other employment (15) D
Other judicial review (39)
2. This case D is 0 is not complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the
factors requiring exceptional judicial management:
a. D Large number of separately represented parties d. D
Large number of witnesses
b. D Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e. D
Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts
issues that will be time-consuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court
c. D Substantial amount of documentary evidence f. D
Substantial postjudgment judicial supervision
3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): a.0 monetary b. D nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief c. D punitive
4. Number of causes of action (specify): (11) Lab. Code § 1197,1198,226,1174,201,203,558, PAGA,B&P 17200 etc.
5. This case D is 0 is not a class action suit.
6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (You may use form CM-015.)
Date: October 22, 2019 ~ :::2?
Sarkis Sinnabekian, Esq. ~ ~
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) ..___ _ __,(""SI-=:GN:-:-:A:-::T:-:-:UR='=E"'=o~F'::-PAR=TY:-:-0=-:R::-cA:-::TT=o==R:-:-:N::;EY-;-;F=-::O-:=-R-:=-PA:-::R:=TY""J-----
NOTICE
• Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed
under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result
in sanctions.
• File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule.
• If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all
other parties to the action or proceeding.
• Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes onlv.
Paae 1 of 2
Fonn Adopted for Mandalory Use Cal. Rules of Court. rules2.30, 3.220, 3.400-3.403, 3.740,
Judicial Council of California
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Cal. Standards of Judicial Administration. std. 3.10
CM-010 [Rav. July 1, 2007] www.courtinfo.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
October 23, 2019
Case Filing Date
October 22, 2019
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 02/16/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/22/2019 05:51 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by H. Flores-Hernandez,Deputy Clerk 19STCV38155 CM..010 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY '{fame, state Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY r- Sarkis Sirmabekian fSBN 2785 81 SIRMABEKIAN LAW FIRM, PC 3435 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1710 Los An,e;eles, California, 90010 TELEPHONE NO.: 818.473.5003 FAXNO.: : 818.476.5619 ATTORNEY FOR (Name):Plaintiff Martin Ve_ga SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los An_geles sTREET ADDREss: 111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDREss: 111 N. Hill Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: LOS Angeles 90012 BRANcH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse CASE NAME: Martin Vega v. Prevalent Logistics Inc., et al. CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET CASE NUMBER: Complex Case Designation 0 Unlimited D Limited D Counter D Joinder (Amount (Amount JUDGE: demanded demanded is Filed with first appearance by defendant exceeds $25,000) $25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) DEPT: Items 1-6 below must be completed (see mstructtons on page 2). 1. Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case: Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation D Auto (22) D Breach of contract/warranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.406-3.403) D Uninsured motorist (46) D Rule 3.740 collections (09) D Antitrust/Trade regulation (03) Other PI/PDIWD {Personal Injury/Property D Other collections (09) D Construction defect (1 0) Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort D Insurance coverage (18) Mass tort (40) D D Asbestos (04) D Other contract (37) D Securities litigation (28) D Product liability (24) Real Property D Environmental/Toxic tort (30) D Medical malpractice (45) D Eminent domain/Inverse D Insurance coverage claims arising from the D Other PI/PD/WD (23) condemnation (14) above listed provisionally complex case Non-PI/PDIWD (Other) Tort D Wrongful eviction (33) types (41) D Business tort/unfair business practice (07) D Other real property (26) Enforcement of Judgment D Civil rights (08) Unlawful Detainer D Enforcement of judgment (20) D Defamation (13) D Commercial (31) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint D Fraud (16) D Residential (32) RIC0(27) D D Intellectual property (19) D Drugs (38) D Other complaint (not specified above) (42) D Professional negligence (25) Judicial Review Miscellaneous Civil Petition D Other non-PIIPD/WD tort (35) D Asset forfeiture (05) D Partnership and corporate governance (21) Employment D Petition re: arbitration award (11) D Other petition (not specified above) (43) D Wrongful termination (36) D Writ of mandate (02) 0 Other employment (15) D Other judicial review (39) 2. This case D is 0 is not complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the factors requiring exceptional judicial management: a. D Large number of separately represented parties d. D Large number of witnesses b. D Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e. D Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts issues that will be time-consuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court c. D Substantial amount of documentary evidence f. D Substantial postjudgment judicial supervision 3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): a.0 monetary b. D nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief c. D punitive 4. Number of causes of action (specify): (11) Lab. Code § 1197,1198,226,1174,201,203,558, PAGA,B&P 17200 etc. 5. This case D is 0 is not a class action suit. 6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (You may use form CM-015.) Date: October 22, 2019 ~ :::2? Sarkis Sinnabekian, Esq. ~ ~ (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) ..___ _ __,(""SI-=:GN:-:-:A:-::T:-:-:UR='=E"'=o~F'::-PAR=TY:-:-0=-:R::-cA:-::TT=o==R:-:-:N::;EY-;-;F=-::O-:=-R-:=-PA:-::R:=TY""J----- NOTICE • Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result in sanctions. • File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule. • If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all other parties to the action or proceeding. • Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes onlv. Paae 1 of 2 Fonn Adopted for Mandalory Use Cal. Rules of Court. rules2.30, 3.220, 3.400-3.403, 3.740, Judicial Council of California CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Cal. Standards of Judicial Administration. std. 3.10 CM-010 [Rav. July 1, 2007] www.courtinfo.ca.gov