arrow left
arrow right
  • GLENN FELDMAN VS KEYSHIA COLE Breach of Rental/Lease Contract (not unlawful detainer or wrongful eviction) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • GLENN FELDMAN VS KEYSHIA COLE Breach of Rental/Lease Contract (not unlawful detainer or wrongful eviction) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

19SMCV01785 Assigned for all purposes to: Santa Monica Courthouse, Judicial Officer: Marc Gross Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/08/2019 05:51 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by B. McClendon,Deputy Clerk 1 MAURICE WAINER (SBN 121678) SNIPPER WAINER & MARKOFF 2 232 North Canon Drive Beverly Hills, California 90210-5302 3 Telephone: (310) 550-5770 e-mail: mrwainer@swmfirm.com 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 GLENN FELDMAN, an individual 6 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 9 WEST DISTRICT – SANTA MONICA COURTHOUSE 10 11 GLENN FELDMAN, an individual, ) Case No. ) 12 Plaintiff, ) Unlimited Civil Action ) 13 vs. ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR ) BREACH OF CONTRACT (WRITTEN 14 KEYSHIA COLE, an individual; and DOES 1- ) LEASE AGREEMENT) 10, inclusive, ) 15 ) Defendants. ) 16 ______________________________________ ) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 17 18 Plaintiff alleges:. 19 1. Plaintiff GLENN FELDMAN in an individual (“Plaintiff”) and the owner of that 20 certain residential property commonly known as 944 Harbor Crossing Lane, Marina Del Rey, 21 California 90292 (the “Property”). 22 2. Defendants KEYSHIA COLE, an individual, and DOES 1-10, inclusive 23 (collectively, “Defendants”) are residents of this jurisdiction and recently resided at the Property. 24 3. The true names and capacities of the defendants DOES I through 10, inclusive, 25 whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, are unknown to Plaintiff and it therefor sues 26 them by the use of fictitious names pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 474. Plaintiff is 27 informed and believes, and based thereon alleges, that each defendant designated as DOE is 28 legally responsible in some manner for the events and happenings hereto, to which reference is 1 COMPLAINT