arrow left
arrow right
  • DAISY VASQUEZ VS SANTA BARBARA FOODS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • DAISY VASQUEZ VS SANTA BARBARA FOODS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/26/2021 06:30 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Lara,Deputy Clerk 1 Omero Banuelos, SBN 228267 2 415 W. Foothill Blvd., Suite 202 Claremont CA 91711 3 Phone: 213-457-7171 Attorneys for Defendants Santa Barbara Foods, Inc. and Jose Medeiros 4 5 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 6 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 7 8 DAISY VASQUEZ, an individual ) Case No: 19STCV44009 9 ) Plaintiff, ) PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO 10 ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL v. ) RESPONSE TO SPECIAL 11 ) INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE; 12 ) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND SANTA BARBARA, INC., a California AUTHORITIES AND DECLARATION 13 Corporation, JOE MEDEIROS, an individual, ) OF OMERO BANUELOS and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, ) 14 ) Defendants. ) Date: February 8, 2021 15 ) Time: 8:30 ) 16 ) Dept: 31 ) 17 ) 18 ) ) 19 ) 20 21 TO EACH PARTY AND TO THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY: 22 23 Defendants, SANTA BARBARA, INC. and JOSE C. MEDEIROS (“Defendants”) 24 hereby opposes the motion to compel responses to Special Interrogatories. This Opposition is 25 based upon the fact that Defendants have timely served Responses to the Special Interrogatories 26 and/or are entitled to relief for mistake, inadvertence or excusable neglect. Further, Plaintiff has 27 not met and conferred in good faith. 28 OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES 1