arrow left
arrow right
  • KINGDOM OF SWEDEN VS DANIEL MICHAEL MENGESHA Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • KINGDOM OF SWEDEN VS DANIEL MICHAEL MENGESHA Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/01/2020 12:00 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Bradley,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address). FOR COURT USE ONLY LAW OFFICES OF ERNEST MOONEY W. Ernest Mooney (State Bar No. 82416) 5020 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 TELEPHONE NO (949) 296-7557 FAX NO. (Optional) (949) 752-2279 E-MAIL ADDRESs (Optional) . emlaw92657@yahoo.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name) Plaintiff Kingdom Of Sweden SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles sTREET ADDREss 1725 Main Street MAILINGADDREss: 1725 Main Street CITY AND ZIP coDE: Santa Monica , California 90401 BRANCH NAMe. West District PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Kingdom Of Sweden DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Daniel Michael Mengesha, CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER (Check one): CZJ UNLIMITED CASE 0 LIMITED CASE 19SMCV01839 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: D~e: April 14, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: M Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): [ZJ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): W . Ernest Mooney INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. UJ This statement is submitted by party (name): P laintiff Kingdom Of Sweden b. 0 Th is statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): October 17, 2019 b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served , have appeared, or have been di.;missed. b. [2] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) []'] have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): Defendant Daniel Michael Mengesha was substitute served effective March 26, 2020. (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in [LJ complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Complaint for breach of contract and common counts. Page 1 of 5 Fonn \dopled lor Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal Rules of Court, Judicial CounCil of Caltforma rules 3. 72o-3.730 CM-110 IRev July 1. 2011] www.courts.ca.gov