On October 17, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Kingdom Of Sweden,
and
Mengesha Daniel Michael,
for Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/01/2020 12:00 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Bradley,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address). FOR COURT USE ONLY
LAW OFFICES OF ERNEST MOONEY
W. Ernest Mooney (State Bar No. 82416)
5020 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660
TELEPHONE NO (949) 296-7557 FAX NO. (Optional) (949) 752-2279
E-MAIL ADDRESs (Optional) . emlaw92657@yahoo.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name) Plaintiff Kingdom Of Sweden
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
sTREET ADDREss 1725 Main Street
MAILINGADDREss: 1725 Main Street
CITY AND ZIP coDE: Santa Monica , California 90401
BRANCH NAMe. West District
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Kingdom Of Sweden
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Daniel Michael Mengesha,
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER
(Check one): CZJ UNLIMITED CASE 0 LIMITED CASE 19SMCV01839
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
D~e: April 14, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: M Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[ZJ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): W . Ernest Mooney
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. UJ This statement is submitted by party (name): P laintiff Kingdom Of Sweden
b. 0 Th is statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): October 17, 2019
b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served , have appeared, or have been di.;missed.
b. [2] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) []'] have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
Defendant Daniel Michael Mengesha was substitute served effective March 26, 2020.
(3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in [LJ complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Complaint for breach of contract and common counts.
Page 1 of 5
Fonn \dopled lor Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal Rules of Court,
Judicial CounCil of Caltforma rules 3. 72o-3.730
CM-110 IRev July 1. 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
April 01, 2020
Case Filing Date
October 17, 2019
Category
Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Default Judgment By Court - Before Trial 09/15/2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.