On September 19, 2019 a
No Value
was filed
involving a dispute between
Liu Huasha,
Maheshwari Sandeepa,
and
Board Of Administration,
Board Of Administration California Public Employees Retirement System,
Southern California Association Of Governments,
California Public Employees Retirement System,
for Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
ot me
RECEIVED
ORIGINAL
JUL 28 2022
TIE, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF ATTORNEY OR PARTY VINE WINDOW Reserved for Clerks File Stamp
Jason Levin
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
333 S. Hope St., 16h Floor, Los Angeles CA 90071
Tel: (213) 576-1000; Email: jason.levin@alston.com
Superior Court Of California
‘ounty of Lo: s Angeles.
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendants California Public Employees’ Retirement System and
Board of Administration California Public Employees’ Retirement System
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AUG 02 2022
COURTHOUSE ADDRESS: Bherti R. Carter, Executive
sda tare
312 N. Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 licer/Clerk of Court
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: By,
Berta Guerrero Deput
Huasha Liu and Sandeepa Maheshwari
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Board of Administration California
Public Employees’ Retirement System
PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICER CASE NUMBER:
19STCP04056
(Code Civ. Proc, § 170.6)
Name of Judicial Officer: (PRINT) Dept. Number:
Honorable Kenneth R. Freeman 14
XX] Judge (1 Commissioner OC Referee
| am a party (or attorney for a party) to this action or special proceeding. The judicial officer named
above, before whom the trial of, or a hearing in, this case is pending, or to whom it has been assigned,
is prejudiced against the party (or his or her attorney) or the interest of the party (or his or her attorney),
so that declarant cannot, or believes that he or she cannot, have a fair and impartial trial or hearing
before the judicial officer.
DECLARATION
| declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the information
entered on this form is true and correct.
California Public Employees’
Retirement System and OC Plaintiff/Petitioner (1 Cross Complainant
Board of Administration & Defendant/Respondent O1 Cross Defendant
California Public Employees’ -
Filed on behalf of: Retirement System
Name of Party
OC Other:
Dated: July 28, 2022
Signature of D&clarant
Jason Levin
Printed Name
TACIV 015 (Rev. 12-14) PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICER Code Civ. Proc., § 170.6
LASC Approved 04-04
For Optional Use (Code Civ. Proc., § 170.6)
Ame
ssarauEormsWe
Document Filed Date
August 02, 2022
Case Filing Date
September 19, 2019
Category
Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
ot me RECEIVED ORIGINAL JUL 28 2022 TIE, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF ATTORNEY OR PARTY VINE WINDOW Reserved for Clerks File Stamp Jason Levin ALSTON & BIRD LLP 333 S. Hope St., 16h Floor, Los Angeles CA 90071 Tel: (213) 576-1000; Email: jason.levin@alston.com Superior Court Of California ‘ounty of Lo: s Angeles. ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendants California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Board of Administration California Public Employees’ Retirement System SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AUG 02 2022 COURTHOUSE ADDRESS: Bherti R. Carter, Executive sda tare 312 N. Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 licer/Clerk of Court PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: By, Berta Guerrero Deput Huasha Liu and Sandeepa Maheshwari DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: California Public Employees’ Retirement System and Board of Administration California Public Employees’ Retirement System PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICER CASE NUMBER: 19STCP04056 (Code Civ. Proc, § 170.6) Name of Judicial Officer: (PRINT) Dept. Number: Honorable Kenneth R. Freeman 14 XX] Judge (1 Commissioner OC Referee | am a party (or attorney for a party) to this action or special proceeding. The judicial officer named above, before whom the trial of, or a hearing in, this case is pending, or to whom it has been assigned, is prejudiced against the party (or his or her attorney) or the interest of the party (or his or her attorney), so that declarant cannot, or believes that he or she cannot, have a fair and impartial trial or hearing before the judicial officer. DECLARATION | declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the information entered on this form is true and correct. California Public Employees’ Retirement System and OC Plaintiff/Petitioner (1 Cross Complainant Board of Administration & Defendant/Respondent O1 Cross Defendant California Public Employees’ - Filed on behalf of: Retirement System Name of Party OC Other: Dated: July 28, 2022 Signature of D&clarant Jason Levin Printed Name TACIV 015 (Rev. 12-14) PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICER Code Civ. Proc., § 170.6 LASC Approved 04-04 For Optional Use (Code Civ. Proc., § 170.6) Ame ssarauEormsWe