arrow left
arrow right
  • RODOLFO AN, ET AL. VS CBS CORPORATION, ET AL. Asbestos- Personal Injury/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • RODOLFO AN, ET AL. VS CBS CORPORATION, ET AL. Asbestos- Personal Injury/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/20/2022 02:45 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by K. Valenzuela,Deputy Clerk 1 Dimitri Nichols, Esq., CA Bar No. 242098 (dnichols@gorilaw.com) 2 Rebecca Cucu, Esq., CA Bar No. 201763 (rcucu@gorilaw.com) 3 THE GORI LAW FIRM, P.C. 3878 W. Carson St., Suite 210 4 Torrance, California 90503 Tel: (424) 383-1501 5 Fax: (424) 383-1504 For service purposes, please use californiaservice@gorilaw.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 12 LAOSD ASBESTOS CASES ) JCCP 4674 ____________________________________ ) [Assigned to Judge Seigle, Dept. 15] 13 CRISTINA C. AN, individually and as the ) personal representative of the Estate of ) Case No.: 19STCV19227 14 RODOLFO AN, deceased, IRIS AN, ) JEFFREY AN, individually, ) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE 15 ) TO EXCLUDE ANY REFERENCE Plaintiffs, ) TO SUPREME COURT RULINGS 16 vs. ) OSHA STANDARDS (No. 13) ) 17 CRANE CO. (sued individually and as ) Trial Date: January 30, 2023 successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE ) Time: 9:00 a.m. 18 CO. and COCHRANE, INC.), et al. ) Dept.: 15 ) 19 Defendants. ) Action Filed: June 4, 2019 20 21 Plaintiffs CHRISTINA AN, IRIS AN and JEFFREY AN (“Plaintiffs”) hereby move this Court 22 for an in limine order for an order precluding any Defendant or witnesses from producing any testimony, 23 evidence, argument, or reference in any way to Supreme Court rulings on Occupational Safety and 24 Health Administration [“OSHA”] standards. 25 This motion is made under the provisions of Evidence Code section 350 wherein it states 26 that“[n]o evidence is admissible except relevant evidence.” If such evidence is allowed to be presented 27 to show that the Supreme Court gave OSHA general guidelines for standard setting, Plaintiffs will be 28 1 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ANY REFERENCE TO SUPREME COURT RULINGS OSHA STANDARDS (No. 13)