arrow left
arrow right
  • THOMAS J MEZA, ET AL. VS BASILE & ASSOCIATES, ET AL. Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • THOMAS J MEZA, ET AL. VS BASILE & ASSOCIATES, ET AL. Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FINED by Superior Court of California, C ounty of Los Angeles on 04/17/2020 01:06 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro, Deputy Cletk Donald Iwuchuku, Esq. SBN: 181726 LAW OFFICES OF DONALD TWUCHUKU 3450 Wilshire Blvd., Ste 1020 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Tel: 213.380.4144 Fax: 213.380.6061 / 888.441.8493 donaldiwuchuku@egmail.com GonalgEw ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS THOMAS J. MEZA and HELEN F. MEZA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES — CENTRAL DISTRICT 11 12: THOMAS J. MEZA; HELEN F. MEZA, CASE NO. :19STCV34911 13 Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT BASILE & ASSOCIATES 14 VS. AND PAUL L. BASILE, ESQ’S DEMURER 15 AND MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS BASILE & ASSOCIATES; OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 16 PAUL L. BASILE, ESQ.; RLF MORTGAGE CORPORATION; MGC MORTGAGE, INC.; 17 DOVENMUEHLE MORTGAGE, INC.; Hearing Date: May 6, 2020 18 ZIEVE, BRODNAX & STEELE, LLP; and Time: 8:30a.m DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Dept: 49 19 Defendants 20 21 22 Factual background 23 A summary of the facts relevant to defendants’ demurrer as stated in plaintiff's Complaint 24 (“complaint”) can be found in paragraphs 25 to 48 as follows: 25 Frustrated as to why MGCMI was not crediting their payments accordingly, Plaintiffs retained 26 Defendants BASILE and BASILE FIRM to represent them in this matter. Plaintiffs were first 27 referred to Defendant BASILE FIRM through a work acquaintance to resolve a similar dispute 28 Plaintiffs had with the mortgage servicing of the senior (1* mortgage) deed of trust. On or about I -- PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT BASILE DEMURRER