Motion-Secondary: WAYNE EDWARDS VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/31/2022 05:29 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by D. Jones,Deputy Clerk

                    1       MCNICHOLAS & MCNICHOLAS LLP
                            Matthew S. McNicholas, State Bar No. 190249
                    2       Emily R. Pincin, State Bar No. 334566
                            Douglas D. Winter, State Bar No. 150795
                    3
                            10866 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400
                    4       Los Angeles, CA 90024
                            Tel: (310) 474-1582
                    5       Fax: (310) 475-7871

                    6       Attorneys for Plaintiff
                            Wayne Edwards
                    7
                    8                                    SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                    9
                                                                               COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
                   10
                   11         WAYNE EDWARDS,                                                             CASE NO. 20STCV03036
                                                                                                         Lead Case: 19STCV45369 (Related Cases:
                   12
                                                              Plaintiff,                                 20STCV03223, 20STCV03046, 20STCV03073)
                   13
                                                   vs.                                                   [Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Kristin S.
                   14                                                                                    Escalante, Dept. 24]
                             CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a government
                   15        entity, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,                                  PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S
                                                                                                         OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
                   16                                                                                    FOR DISCOVERY OF PEACE OFFICER
                                                   Defendants.
                                                                                                         PERSONNEL AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
                   17                                                                                    (“PITCHESS”) (EVID. CODE §§ 1043 et seq.)
                   18
                                                                                                         Date: June 7, 2022
                   19                                                                                    Time: 8:30 a.m.
                                                                                                         Dept.: 24
                   20
                                                                                                         RES ID: 084532965873
                   21
                   22                                                                                    Trial Date: May 22, 2023
                                                                                                         Complaint Filed: January 24, 2020
                   23
                   24                  TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND TO THE
                   25       CITY OF LOS ANGELES:
                   26                  Plaintiff WAYNE EDWARDS (“Plaintiff”) hereby submits this Reply to Defendant City of
                   27       Los Angeles’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Discovery of Peace Officer Personnel and Other
                   28       Documents (“Pitchess”) pursuant to Evidence Code §§ 1043, et seq.
                                                                                         1
                                      Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Production of Pitchess Documents