arrow left
arrow right
  • KIAN MORADZADEH VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC ENTITY, ET AL. Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • KIAN MORADZADEH VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC ENTITY, ET AL. Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/06/2021 05:40 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by V. Yonker,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Lisa I. Lawrence/ Bar No. 140480 Diederich & Associates 21680 Gatetway Center Drive, Suite 100, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 TELEPHONE NO.: (714) 922-1333 FAX NO. (Optional): (855) 260-0258 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): Lisa.I.Lawrence@Travelers.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): International Fidelity Insurance Company and Ramona, Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 1725 Main Street MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: Santa Monica, 90401 BRANCH NAME: West District PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Kian Moradzadeh DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: City of Los Angeles, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 19SMCV02137 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: July 21, 2021 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: M Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Lisa Lawrence INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): International Fidelity Insurance Company and Ramona, Inc. b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): 12/13/2019 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): This is a case where the City of Los Angeles performed emergency sewer repair work on Plaintiff's property. The City of Los Angeles retained Ramona, Inc. to assist with the sewer repairs. Plaintiff alleged damages from the repairs exceeding $400,000. Defendants dispute the claims. Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov