arrow left
arrow right
  • CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF CITIBANK, N.A., VS MAGALI GONZALEZ Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF CITIBANK, N.A., VS MAGALI GONZALEZ Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/04/2020 08:29 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Williams,Deputy Clerk Brian N. Winn (State Bar No. 86779) Laura M. Hoalst (State Bar No. 101082) John E. Gordon (State Bar No. 180053) Jason M. Burrows (State Bar No. 309882) Amit Taneja (State Bar No. 304559) Grace Gail Cara (State Bar No. 315558) Cherrie Y. Tan (State Bar No. 324871) Katrina Trinh (State Bar No. 327357) Juan Villanueva (State Bar No. 328049) Winn Law Group, A Professional Corporation 110 E Wilshire Ave Ste 212, Fullerton CA 92832 Telephone: (714) 446-6686, Fax No; (714) 446—6680 File No: l9-l3223-0-CDG—DGR— (19i0-00) Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY, SOUTHEAST DISTRICT CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, as assignee of Case No. 19NWLC45455 CITIBANK, N.A., Limited Civil Case Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF ’8 REQUEST FOR vs. JUDICIAL NOTICE AND SUPPLEMENTAL REFERENCE MAGALI GONZALEZ, et al., MEMORANDUM OF COMPARISON EXHIBITS FOR LEGISLATIVE Defendant(s). HISTORY OF SB 233 and SB 890 Compiaint Filed: 11/20/19 Plaintiff hereby requests the Court take judicial notice of the attached documents as legislative history discussing Senate Bill 233, and Senate Bill 890 (its predecessor), to show the purpose of the statute enaction and the deletion of specific language in Civil Code section 1788.60: “(13) For the purpose of this section, the only evidence sufficient to establish the amount and nature of the debt shall be properly authenticated business records that satisfy the Page 1 PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF CASE IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR 3UDGMEN’?