arrow left
arrow right
  • ILYA NODEL VS TREEIUM INC. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ILYA NODEL VS TREEIUM INC. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

rnia Supe rior Fue ‘of Califo unty of Los Angeles JAN -6 2023 Sher R. Cal ve OrfcerClerk of Curt Deppity Superior Court of California By. County of Los Angeles Department 50 ILYA NODEL, Case No. 20STCV03570 Plaintiff, Hearing Date January 6, 2023 VS. Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m. 10 TREEIUM INC., et al [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE ll Defendants. MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL 12 13 14 Lonnie D. Giamela of Fisher & Phillips LLP (“Counsel”) moves to be relieved as counsel 15 for Defendant Treeium Inc. 16 The Court notes that while Counsel has provided sufficient reason for withdrawal, Item 6 17 of the proposed order does not list Counsel’s client’s telephone number. 18 In addition, the Court notes that after the instant motion was filed, an application for 19 order for appearance and examination was filed. The hearing on the application is scheduled for 20 January 10, 2023, but is not referenced in the declaration or proposed order in support of the 21 motion to be relieved as counsel. The Court notes that pursuant to Cal. Rules of Court, rule 22 3.1362, subdivision (e), “[t]he proposed order relieving counsel must specify all hearing dates 23 scheduled in the action or proceeding, including the date of trial, if known.” 24 The Court will revised the proposed order to reflect the new hearing date and the client’s 25 telephone number if provided at the hearing 26 Mt 27 28