On November 14, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Iannucci Laureen,
and
Autozone Inc. A Corporation,
Autozoners Llc,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/16/2020 12:35 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Sanchez,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
‘ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stale Bar number, and address). FOR COURT USE ONLY
MICHAEL HOFFMAN, Bar No. 162496
JARENA HOFFMAN LLP
220 Montgomery Street, Suite 905, San Francisco, CA 94104
TELEPHONE NO. (415) 433-1414 FAX NO. (Optional): (415) 520-0446
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optionay: mhoffman@arenahoffman.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendant AUTOZONE, INC.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
street appress: 111 N. Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Log Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: LAUREEN IANNUCCI
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: AUTOZONE, INC.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE CJ uimitep case 19STCV41003
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: July 2, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: 19 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intentto Appear by Telephone, by (name): Michael Hoffman
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendant AUTOZONE, INC.
b. [1 This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. [] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. [] Allparties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. [2] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) [£2] have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [27] have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. [1] The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint Co cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Employment discrimination, harassment, retaliation, breach of contract.
Page 1 of &
Form Adopted for MandatoryUse CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Cour,
Judicial Council of California ‘ules 3,720-3.730
(CM-110 (Rev. July4, 2011] wnnw.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
June 16, 2020
Case Filing Date
November 14, 2019
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 09/29/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.