arrow left
arrow right
  • LAUREEN IANNUCCI VS AUTOZONE, INC. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • LAUREEN IANNUCCI VS AUTOZONE, INC. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/16/2020 12:35 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Sanchez,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ‘ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stale Bar number, and address). FOR COURT USE ONLY MICHAEL HOFFMAN, Bar No. 162496 JARENA HOFFMAN LLP 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 905, San Francisco, CA 94104 TELEPHONE NO. (415) 433-1414 FAX NO. (Optional): (415) 520-0446 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optionay: mhoffman@arenahoffman.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendant AUTOZONE, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES street appress: 111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: Log Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: LAUREEN IANNUCCI DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: AUTOZONE, INC. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ‘CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE CJ uimitep case 19STCV41003 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: July 2, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: 19 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intentto Appear by Telephone, by (name): Michael Hoffman INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendant AUTOZONE, INC. b. [1 This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. [] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. [] Allparties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [2] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) [£2] have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) [27] have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. [1] The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): Description of case a. Type of case in complaint Co cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Employment discrimination, harassment, retaliation, breach of contract. Page 1 of & Form Adopted for MandatoryUse CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Cour, Judicial Council of California ‘ules 3,720-3.730 (CM-110 (Rev. July4, 2011] wnnw.courts.ca.gov