arrow left
arrow right
  • LAUREEN IANNUCCI VS AUTOZONE, INC. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • LAUREEN IANNUCCI VS AUTOZONE, INC. Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/17/2020 02:32 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Tang,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Lawrance A. Bohm, (SBN: 208716); Bradley J. Mancuso, (SBN: 285616) Christina R. Kerner, (SBN: 319474); BOHM LAW GROUP, INC. 21051 Warner Center Lane, Suite 225, Woodland Hills, CA 91367 TELEPHONE NO.: 866.920.1292 FAX NO. (Optional): 916.927.2046 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): brad@bohmlaw.com; red@bohmlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff, LAUREEN IANNUCCI SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, 90012 BRANCH NAME: STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: LAUREEN IANNUCCI DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: AUTOZONE, INC. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 19STCV41003 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: July 2, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 19 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Bradley J. Mancuso, Esq. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff, LAUREEN IANNUCCI b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): November 14, 2019 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Harassment; Discrimination; FEHA Retaliation; Failure to Prevent; Labor Code 1102.5; LC 6310; Adverse Action In Violation of Public Policty; Intentional Misrepresentation; False Promise; Negligent Misrepresentation Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov