On November 14, 2019 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Iannucci Laureen,
and
Autozone Inc. A Corporation,
Autozoners Llc,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/01/2022 09:44 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by K. Hung,Deputy Clerk
1 MICHAEL HOFFMAN, Bar No. 162496
ARENA HOFFMAN LLP
2 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 905
San Francisco, CA 94104
3 Telephone: 415.433.1414
Facsimile: 415.520.0446
4 Email: mhoffman@arenahoffman.com
5 Attorneys for Defendant
AUTOZONERS, LLC
6
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
10
11 LAUREN IANNUCCI, an individual, Case No. 19STCV41003
12 Plaintiff, Assigned For All Purposes to Dept. 19
Hon. Stephanie M. Bowick
13 v.
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION
14 AUTOZONE, INC., a corporation, and FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN
DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
15
Defendants. ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES
16
Date: May 11, 2023
17 Time: 8:30 A.M.
Dept.: 19
18
LASC Motion Reservation # 251344534514
19
Action Filed: November 14, 2019
20
Trial Date: September 13, 2022
21
TO PLAINTIFF AND HER ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
22
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on May 11, 2023 at 8:30 A.M., or as soon thereafter as the
23
matter may be heard, in Department 19 of the above-referenced Court, located at 111 North Hill
24
Street, Los Angeles, California, Defendant AutoZone, Inc. will and hereby does move, pursuant to
25
California Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, for summary judgment on all causes of action in
26
Plaintiff’s Complaint. Defendant makes this Motion on the grounds that each cause of action
27
asserted in the Complaint fails to present triable issues of fact and lacks sufficient evidence to
28
ARENA HOFFMAN LLP
220 Mo ntgomery Street
Suite 9 05
San Fra ncisco, CA 941 04
415.4 33.1414 NOTICE MOTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 19STCV41003
Document Filed Date
June 01, 2022
Case Filing Date
November 14, 2019
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 09/29/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.