arrow left
arrow right
  • CHRISTINE LUNSFORD VS THE JUICE PLUS+ COMPANY, LLC, ET AL. Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CHRISTINE LUNSFORD VS THE JUICE PLUS+ COMPANY, LLC, ET AL. Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Evan J. Smith, Esquire (SBN 242352) Ryan P. Cardona, Esquire (SBN 302113) BRODSKY & SMITH, LLC 9595 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 900 FILED Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Telephone: (877) 534-2590 “Bs tor Court ef California lunty of Los Anaeles Facsimile: (310) 247-0160 NOV 22 2019 Attorneys for Plaintiff a R, me Officer Clark of Cobrt Isaac Love SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 19STCV42051 10 11 CHRISTINE LUNSFORD, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Case No.: TSO2HAILS6T CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR: Plaintiff, 12 1 VIOLATIONS OF CALIFORNIA’S vs. UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW (BUSINESS 13 AND PROFESSIONS CODE §§ 17200 et THE JUICE PLUS+ COMPANY, LLC, seq.) 14 NATURAL ALTERNATIVES INTERNATIONAL, INC., and DOES 1- JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 15 10, inclusive, 16 By Fax Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Christine Lunsford (“Plaintiff”), by and through her attorneys, alleges the 18 following based upon personal knowledge as to her own acts, and upon information and belief and 19 her attorneys’ investigation as to all other facts. 20 21 1 Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and on behalf of a Class (defined herein) of California citizens who purchased subscriptions for dietary supplements, from defendants The Juice Plus+ 22 Company, LLC and Natural Alternatives International, Inc. (collectively, “Juice Plus”), brings this 23 class action complaint for violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Bus. & Prof. Code 24 §§ 17200 et seq. (the “UCL”) based upon Juice Plus’s violations of California’s Automatic 25 Renewal Law, Bus & Prof. Code §§ 17600 et seq. (the “ARL”). The Class includes all California 26 citizens who purchased product subscriptions from Juice Plus within the applicable statute of 27 limitations period up to and include the date of judgment in this action (the “Relevant Period”). 28 als COMPLAINT