arrow left
arrow right
  • REYNA RODRIGUEZ VS DIMENSION DEVELOPMENT TWO, LLC, A LOUISIANA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • REYNA RODRIGUEZ VS DIMENSION DEVELOPMENT TWO, LLC, A LOUISIANA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/17/2020 03:12 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) FOR COURT USE ONLY Ramin R. Younessi, Esq. (SBN 175020); SamanthaL. Ortiz, Esq. (SBN 312503) Law Offices of Ramin R. Younessi, A.P.L.C 3435 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2200, Los Angeles, CA 90010 TevepHoNe no: (213) 480-6200 FAXNO. (Optona): (213) 480-6201 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): sortiz@younessilaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff, Reyna Rodriguez ‘SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles ‘STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND zIP Cove: Log Angeles 90012 BRANCH NAME: Central District PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Reyna Rodriguez DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Dimension Development Two, LLC, et al CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one). UNLIMITED CASE [1 umitep case 19STCV42052 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: April 1, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 38 Div. Room: Address of court (if different from the address above). [] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name). INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided Party or parties (answer one): This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff, Reyna Rodriguez b. [1 This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): November 22, 2019 b. LJ] The cross. complaint, if any, was filed on (date). Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. C5 al parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [-] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not) (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names). see attachment 3.b.(2) (3) [1 have had a default entered against them (specify names). c. [-) The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): Description of case a. Type of case in complaint [1 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action). see attachment 4.a Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Cour, ‘Judicial Council of California rules 3.720-3.730 (CM-110 (Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov