arrow left
arrow right
  • DONALD NANI JR., AN INDIVIDUAL VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, A PUBLIC ENTITY, ET AL. Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • DONALD NANI JR., AN INDIVIDUAL VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, A PUBLIC ENTITY, ET AL. Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/29/2020 11:25 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Yanez,Deputy Clerk 1 MICHAEL N. FEUER, City Atty., SBN111529 KATHLEEN A. KENEALY, 2 Chief Assistant City Atty., SBN212289 SCOTT MARCUS, Senior Asst. City Atty., SBN184980 3 WILBERTA BREEDY-RICHARDSON, Managing Asst. City Atty., SBN110254 4 KIMBERLY R. WILLIS, Deputy City Atty., SBN188700 5 600 City Hall East 200 North Main Street 6 Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone Number (213) 978-6932 7 Fax Number (213) 978-8789 8 Attorneys for Defendant - CITY OF LOS ANGELES 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT - UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE 11 DONALD NANI JR., an individual, ) Case No. 19STCV39796 12 ) ) No Fee – Gov’t Code §6103 13 Plaintiff, ) ) Assigned to SSC Dept.: 32 vs. ) Action Filed: 11/05/2019 14 ) ) ANSWER OF DEFENDANT CITY OF 15 LOS ANGELES TO PLAINTIFF’S ) CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity; ) COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY 16 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public TRIAL ) 17 entity; and DOES 1 to 50, Inclusive, ) ) FSC: ) Date: 04/20/2021 18 Time: 10:00 am Defendants. ) 19 ) ) Non-Jury Trial: ) Date: 05/04/2021 20 Time: 8:30 am ) 21 ) 22 DEFENDANT, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, answering the Complaint for itself and for 23 no other parties, admits, denies and alleges as follows: 24 1. Pursuant to Section 431.30 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, defendant denies 25 each and every allegation contained in the unverified pleading. 26 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 27 As separate and distinct affirmative defenses, defendant alleges each of the following: 28 1 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT CITY OF LOS ANGELES TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT