On October 15, 2019 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Sanders Brian,
and
Santa Monica Police Department,
for Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/09/2019 01:25 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Tang,Deputy Clerk
LANE DILG
1 City Attorney
ISABEL BIRRUETA, State Bar No. 223485
2 Isabel.birrueta@smgov.net
Deputy City Attorney
3 1685 Main Street, Room 310
Santa Monica, California 90401
4 Telephone: (310) 458-8336
Facsimile: (310) 395-6627
5
Attorneys for City of Santa Monica Exempt from filing fee pursuant
6 to Government Code §6103
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
10
11 BRIAN SANDERS, Case No. 19STCP04433
12 Petitioner and Plaintiff, RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO
VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF
13 v. MANDATE
14 SANTA MONICA POLICE DEPARTMENT, [Assigned to Hon. Mary H. Strobel,
and DOES 1through 10, inclusive, Dept. 82]
15
Respondents and Defendants.
16
17
18 Respondent the City of Santa Monica (“City”), answering for itself and no other
19 Respondent, hereby answers the Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate Pursuant to California
20 Public Records Act and Complaint for Declaratory Relief (“Petition”) by admitting, denying,
21 and affirmatively alleging as follows:
22 1. Answering to the allegation in Paragraph 2, Respondent lacks sufficient
23 information and knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation and therefore
24 denies same.
25 2. Answering to the allegation in Paragraph 3, Respondent admits that Santa
26 Monica Police Department (“SMPD”) is covered under the California Public Records Act.
27 Except as specifically admitted, Respondent denies the remainder of the allegations in the
28 1
RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE
Document Filed Date
December 09, 2019
Case Filing Date
October 15, 2019
Category
Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 01/17/2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/09/2019 01:25 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Tang,Deputy Clerk LANE DILG 1 City Attorney ISABEL BIRRUETA, State Bar No. 223485 2 Isabel.birrueta@smgov.net Deputy City Attorney 3 1685 Main Street, Room 310 Santa Monica, California 90401 4 Telephone: (310) 458-8336 Facsimile: (310) 395-6627 5 Attorneys for City of Santa Monica Exempt from filing fee pursuant 6 to Government Code §6103 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 11 BRIAN SANDERS, Case No. 19STCP04433 12 Petitioner and Plaintiff, RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF 13 v. MANDATE 14 SANTA MONICA POLICE DEPARTMENT, [Assigned to Hon. Mary H. Strobel, and DOES 1through 10, inclusive, Dept. 82] 15 Respondents and Defendants. 16 17 18 Respondent the City of Santa Monica (“City”), answering for itself and no other 19 Respondent, hereby answers the Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate Pursuant to California 20 Public Records Act and Complaint for Declaratory Relief (“Petition”) by admitting, denying, 21 and affirmatively alleging as follows: 22 1. Answering to the allegation in Paragraph 2, Respondent lacks sufficient 23 information and knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation and therefore 24 denies same. 25 2. Answering to the allegation in Paragraph 3, Respondent admits that Santa 26 Monica Police Department (“SMPD”) is covered under the California Public Records Act. 27 Except as specifically admitted, Respondent denies the remainder of the allegations in the 28 1 RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE