arrow left
arrow right
  • Robert Harris v. Intimo, Inc., Nathan Nathan, Tommy Nathan, Moris Zilkha, Prestige Employee Administrators, Inc. A/K/A Prestige Employee Administrators, Prestige Employee Administrators Ii, Inc. A/K/A Prestige Employee Administrators, John Does 1 - 10, Abc Corps. 1 - 8 Commercial - Contract document preview
  • Robert Harris v. Intimo, Inc., Nathan Nathan, Tommy Nathan, Moris Zilkha, Prestige Employee Administrators, Inc. A/K/A Prestige Employee Administrators, Prestige Employee Administrators Ii, Inc. A/K/A Prestige Employee Administrators, John Does 1 - 10, Abc Corps. 1 - 8 Commercial - Contract document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/24/2019 11:21 AM INDEX NO. 650175/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/24/2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK . ..- -- -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - --X ROBERT HARRIS, : Index No. 650175/2017 : Hon. Nancy Bannon vs. : Part 42 INTIMO, INC., NATHAN NATHAN Mot. Seq. No. individually ,TOMMY NATHAN, individually, MORIS ZILKHA, individually, PRESTIGE . NOTICE OF MOTION EMPLOYEE ADMINISTRATORS, INC. a/k/a : TO DISMISS THE FIRST PRESTIGE EMPLOYEE ADMINISTRATORS, : AMENDED COMPLAINT PRESTIGE EMPLOYEE ADMINISTRATORS . II, INC. a/k/a PRESTIGE EMPLOYEE ADMINISTRATORS and JOHN DOES 1-10, and ABC CORPS. 1-8, fictitious names for persons or entities whose roles and identities are unknown, . . . Defendants. - -- - - -- - - -------- - ---------- - - -- - - --x PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon that Affirmation of David B. Lichtenberg, the exhibits annexed thereto, and Defendants Prestige Employee Administrators, Inc. and Prestige Employee Administrators II,Inc.'s Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, Defendants Prestige Employee Administrators, Inc. and Prestige Employee Administrators II, Inc. (collectively "Prestige") will move this Court in the Motion Submission Part Courtroom, Room 130, 60 Centre Street, New York, New York 10007, at 9:30 a.m., on August 9, 2019, or as soon thereafter as Prestige may be heard, for an Order, pursuant to CPLR 3211, dismissing the First Amended Complaint ("Complaint") against Prestige because a defense is founded upon documentary evidence and the Complaint failsto state a cause of action. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to CPLR 2214(b), answering papers, if any, must be served at least seven (7) days before the return date of this motion. FPDOCS 35803731.1 1 of 2 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/24/2019 11:21 AM INDEX NO. 650175/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/24/2019 Dated: Murray Hill, NJ July 24, 2019 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP David B. Lichtenber . Esq. Eric T. Baginski, Esq. 430 Mountain Avenue, Suite 303 Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974 Telephone: (908) 516-1050 Fax: (908) 516-1051 E-mail: dlichtenberg@fisherphillips.com ebaginski@fisherphillips.com Attorneys for Defendants Prestige Employee Administrators, Inc. and Prestige Employee Administrators II, Inc. To: Jonathan Meyers, Esq. Meyers Fried-Grodin, LLP Empire State Building 350 Fifth Avenue, 59th Floor New York, New York 10118 Telephone: (646) 596-1292 E-mail: jmeyers@mfglegal.com Attorney for Plaintiff Robert Harris Seth L. Marcus, Esq. Law Offices of Seth L. Marcus, Esq. 777 Westchester Avenue, Suite 101 White Plains, New York 10604 Telephone: (212) 686-2555 E-mail: seth@slmarcuslaw.com Attorney for Defendants Intimo, Inc., Nathan Nathan, Tommy Nathan, and Morris Zilkha 2 FPDOCS 35803731.1 2 of 2