arrow left
arrow right
  • JAIME MARTINEZ, ET AL. VS CERRITOS FORD, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DBA CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN, ET AL. Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JAIME MARTINEZ, ET AL. VS CERRITOS FORD, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DBA CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN, ET AL. Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/04/2021 02:19 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by K. Hung,Deputy Clerk 1 KNIGHT LAW GROUP, LLP Steve Mikhov (SBN 224676) 2 stevem@knightlaw.com 3 Amy Morse (SBN 290502) amym@knightlaw.com 4 Armando Lopez (SBN 323668) armandol@knightlaw.com 5 10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 2500 6 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 552-2250 7 Fax: (310) 552-7973 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 9 JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS MARTINEZ 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 11 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 12 13 JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS Case No.: 20STCV12160 14 MARTINEZ, Unlimited Jurisdiction 15 Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL 16 FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUEST 17 vs. FOR PRODUCTION FROM DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR 18 COMPANY, AND REQUEST FOR CERRITOS FORD, INC., a California SANCTIONS; MEMORANDUM IN 19 Corporation dba CERRITOS FORD SUPPORT OF MOTION 20 LINCOLN; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 through [Filed concurrently with Separate Statement 21 10, inclusive, of Issues, [Proposed] Order, and Declaration of Armando Lopez and Exhibits Thereto] 22 Defendants. 23 Hearing Date: March 5, 2021 Hearing Time: 9:30 a.m. 24 Department: 58 25 Complaint Filed: March 26, 2020 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION