On March 26, 2020 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Martinez Jaime,
Martinez Phyllis,
and
Cerritos Ford Inc Dba Cerritos Ford Lincoln,
Ford Motor Company,
for Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/27/2023 06:52 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by P. Muro,Deputy Clerk
1 Michael D. Mortenson, State Bar No. 247758
mmortenson@mortensontaggart.com
2 Craig A. Taggart, State Bar No. 239168
ctaggart@mortensontaggart.com
3 Denetta E.J. Scott, State Bar No. 236899
dscott@mortensontaggart.com
4 MORTENSON TAGGART ADAMS LLP
300 Spectrum Center Dr., Suite 1200
5 Irvine, CA 92618
Telephone: (949) 774-2224
6 Facsimile: (949) 774-2545
7 Attorneys for Defendants
FORD MOTOR COMPANY AND
8 CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN
9
10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
11 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
12 JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS Case No. 20STCV12160
MARTINEZ, Hon. Bruce G. Iwasaki
13 Dept. 58
14 Plaintiffs,
15 vs. DEFENDANTS FORD MOTOR
COMPANY’S AND CERRITOS
16 CERRITOS FORD, INC., a California FORD, INC. DBA CERRITOS FORD
LINCOLN’S MOTION IN LIMINE
Corporation dba CERRITOS FORD NO. 9 TO PROHIBIT AND
17 LINCOLN; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a EXCLUDE ARGUMENT AND
Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through TESTIMONY THAT FORD HAD AN
18
10, inclusive, AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO
19 REPURCHASE OR REPLACE
Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ VEHICLE
20
[Filed concurrently with the Declaration
21 of Denetta E.J. Scott and (Proposed)
Order]
22
23 Date: March 21, 2023
Time: 9:00 a.m.
24 Dept.: 58
25
Complaint Filed: March 26, 2020
26 Jury Trial Date: April 3, 2023
27
28
-1-
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9 TO EXCLUDE ARGUMENT FORD HAD AN AFFIRMATIVE DUTY
Document Filed Date
February 27, 2023
Case Filing Date
March 26, 2020
Category
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/27/2023 06:52 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by P. Muro,Deputy Clerk 1 Michael D. Mortenson, State Bar No. 247758 mmortenson@mortensontaggart.com 2 Craig A. Taggart, State Bar No. 239168 ctaggart@mortensontaggart.com 3 Denetta E.J. Scott, State Bar No. 236899 dscott@mortensontaggart.com 4 MORTENSON TAGGART ADAMS LLP 300 Spectrum Center Dr., Suite 1200 5 Irvine, CA 92618 Telephone: (949) 774-2224 6 Facsimile: (949) 774-2545 7 Attorneys for Defendants FORD MOTOR COMPANY AND 8 CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 12 JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS Case No. 20STCV12160 MARTINEZ, Hon. Bruce G. Iwasaki 13 Dept. 58 14 Plaintiffs, 15 vs. DEFENDANTS FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S AND CERRITOS 16 CERRITOS FORD, INC., a California FORD, INC. DBA CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN’S MOTION IN LIMINE Corporation dba CERRITOS FORD NO. 9 TO PROHIBIT AND 17 LINCOLN; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a EXCLUDE ARGUMENT AND Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through TESTIMONY THAT FORD HAD AN 18 10, inclusive, AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO 19 REPURCHASE OR REPLACE Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ VEHICLE 20 [Filed concurrently with the Declaration 21 of Denetta E.J. Scott and (Proposed) Order] 22 23 Date: March 21, 2023 Time: 9:00 a.m. 24 Dept.: 58 25 Complaint Filed: March 26, 2020 26 Jury Trial Date: April 3, 2023 27 28 -1- DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9 TO EXCLUDE ARGUMENT FORD HAD AN AFFIRMATIVE DUTY