On March 26, 2020 a
Opposition - OPPOSITION DEFENDANTS FORD MOTOR COMPANYS AND CERRITOS FORD LINCOLNS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 TO PROHIBIT TESTIMONY OR ARGUMENT THAT DEFENDANT CONFORMED THE VEHICLE
was filed
involving a dispute between
Martinez Jaime,
Martinez Phyllis,
and
Cerritos Ford Inc Dba Cerritos Ford Lincoln,
Ford Motor Company,
for Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/08/2023 05:18 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Lopez,Deputy Clerk
1 Michael D. Mortenson, State Bar No. 247758
mmortenson@mortensontaggart.com
2 Craig A. Taggart, State Bar No. 239168
ctaggart@mortensontaggart.com
3 Denetta E.J. Scott, State Bar No. 236899
dscott@mortensontaggart.com
4 MORTENSON TAGGART ADAMS LLP
300 Spectrum Center Dr., Suite 1200
5 Irvine, CA 92618
Telephone: (949) 774-2224
6 Facsimile: (949) 774-2545
7 Attorneys for Defendants
FORD MOTOR COMPANY AND
8 CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN
9
10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
11 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
12
JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS Case No. 20STCV12160
13 MARTINEZ, Hon. Bruce G. Iwasaki
Dept. 58
14 Plaintiffs,
15 vs. DEFENDANTS FORD MOTOR
COMPANY’S AND CERRITOS FORD
16 CERRITOS FORD, INC., a California LINCOLN’S OPPOSITION TO
Corporation dba CERRITOS FORD PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO.
17 LINCOLN; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a 3 TO PROHIBIT TESTIMONY OR
Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through ARGUMENT THAT DEFENDANT
18 10, inclusive, CONFORMED THE VEHICLE WITHIN
A REASONABLE NUMBER OF REPAIR
19 Defendant. ATTEMPTS BECAUSE DEFENDANT
REPAIRED A PARTICULAR
20 COMPONENT
21 Date: March 21, 2023
Time: 9:00 a.m.
22 Dept.: 58
23
Complaint Filed: March 26, 2020
24 Jury Trial Date: April 3, 2023
25
26
27
28
DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3
Document Filed Date
March 08, 2023
Case Filing Date
March 26, 2020
Category
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/08/2023 05:18 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Lopez,Deputy Clerk 1 Michael D. Mortenson, State Bar No. 247758 mmortenson@mortensontaggart.com 2 Craig A. Taggart, State Bar No. 239168 ctaggart@mortensontaggart.com 3 Denetta E.J. Scott, State Bar No. 236899 dscott@mortensontaggart.com 4 MORTENSON TAGGART ADAMS LLP 300 Spectrum Center Dr., Suite 1200 5 Irvine, CA 92618 Telephone: (949) 774-2224 6 Facsimile: (949) 774-2545 7 Attorneys for Defendants FORD MOTOR COMPANY AND 8 CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 12 JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS Case No. 20STCV12160 13 MARTINEZ, Hon. Bruce G. Iwasaki Dept. 58 14 Plaintiffs, 15 vs. DEFENDANTS FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S AND CERRITOS FORD 16 CERRITOS FORD, INC., a California LINCOLN’S OPPOSITION TO Corporation dba CERRITOS FORD PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 17 LINCOLN; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a 3 TO PROHIBIT TESTIMONY OR Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through ARGUMENT THAT DEFENDANT 18 10, inclusive, CONFORMED THE VEHICLE WITHIN A REASONABLE NUMBER OF REPAIR 19 Defendant. ATTEMPTS BECAUSE DEFENDANT REPAIRED A PARTICULAR 20 COMPONENT 21 Date: March 21, 2023 Time: 9:00 a.m. 22 Dept.: 58 23 Complaint Filed: March 26, 2020 24 Jury Trial Date: April 3, 2023 25 26 27 28 DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3