arrow left
arrow right
  • JAIME MARTINEZ, ET AL. VS CERRITOS FORD, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DBA CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN, ET AL. Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JAIME MARTINEZ, ET AL. VS CERRITOS FORD, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DBA CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN, ET AL. Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/08/2023 05:18 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Lopez,Deputy Clerk 1 Michael D. Mortenson, State Bar No. 247758 mmortenson@mortensontaggart.com 2 Craig A. Taggart, State Bar No. 239168 ctaggart@mortensontaggart.com 3 Denetta E.J. Scott, State Bar No. 236899 dscott@mortensontaggart.com 4 MORTENSON TAGGART ADAMS LLP 300 Spectrum Center Dr., Suite 1200 5 Irvine, CA 92618 Telephone: (949) 774-2224 6 Facsimile: (949) 774-2545 7 Attorneys for Defendants FORD MOTOR COMPANY AND 8 CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 12 13 JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS Case No. 20STCV12160 MARTINEZ, Hon. Bruce G. Iwasaki 14 Dept. 58 Plaintiffs, 15 vs. DEFENDANTS FORD MOTOR 16 COMPANY’S AND CERRITOS FORD CERRITOS FORD, INC., a California LINCOLN’S OPPOSITION TO 17 Corporation dba CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 18 Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 11 TO PRECLUDE ARGUMENT THAT 10, inclusive, VEHICLE INSURANCE AND 19 REGISTRATION INCURRED AFTER Defendants. THE VEHICLE QUALIFIED FOR A 20 REPURCHASE ARE NOT 21 RECOVERABLE UNDER THE SONG- BEVERLY ACT, OR ARE OTHERWISE 22 THE STANDARD COSTS OF OWNERSHIP 23 24 Date: March 21, 2023 Time: 9:00 a.m. 25 Dept.: 58 26 Complaint Filed: March 26, 2020 27 Jury Trial Date: April 3, 2023 28 DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 11