On March 26, 2020 a
Opposition - OPPOSITION PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9 TO PROHIBIT AND EXCLUDE ARGUMENT AND TESTIMONY THAT FORD HAD AN AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO REPURCHASE OR REPLACE PLAINTIFFS
was filed
involving a dispute between
Martinez Jaime,
Martinez Phyllis,
and
Cerritos Ford Inc Dba Cerritos Ford Lincoln,
Ford Motor Company,
for Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/08/2023 07:06 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Lopez,Deputy Clerk
KNIGHT LAW GROUP, LLP
1
Deepak Devabose (SBN 298890)
2 deepakd@knightlaw.com
10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 2500
3 Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel.: (310) 552-2250
4
Fax: (310) 552-7973
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
6 JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS MARTINEZ
7 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
8 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
9
JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS Case No.: 20STCV12160
10 MARTINEZ,
Hon. Bruce G. Iwasaki, Dept. 58
11
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO
Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE
12
NO. 9 TO PROHIBIT AND EXCLUDE
13 vs. ARGUMENT AND TESTIMONY
THAT FORD HAD AN
14 AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO
CERRITOS FORD, INC., a California REPURCHASE OR REPLACE
15 PLAINTIFF’S VEHICLE
Corporation dba CERRITOS FORD
16 LINCOLN; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a
Date Filed: March 26, 2020
Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 through
17 Trial Date: April 3, 2023
10, inclusive,
18
Defendants
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9
Document Filed Date
March 08, 2023
Case Filing Date
March 26, 2020
Category
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.