On March 26, 2020 a
Opposition - OPPOSITION PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT OF OTHER LEMON LAW CASES, UNRELATED VEHICLE DEFECTS, AND UNRELATED RECALLS AND SERVI
was filed
involving a dispute between
Martinez Jaime,
Martinez Phyllis,
and
Cerritos Ford Inc Dba Cerritos Ford Lincoln,
Ford Motor Company,
for Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/08/2023 07:06 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Lopez,Deputy Clerk
KNIGHT LAW GROUP, LLP
1
Deepak Devabose (SBN 298890)
2 deepakd@knightlaw.com
10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 2500
3 Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel.: (310) 552-2250
4
Fax: (310) 552-7973
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
6 JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS MARTINEZ
7
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
8
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
9
10 JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS Case No.: 20STCV12160
MARTINEZ,
11 Assigned to: Hon. Bruce G. Iwasaki
Plaintiffs, Dept. 58
12
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO
vs. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE
13
NO. 2 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND
14 ARGUMENT OF OTHER LEMON
CERRITOS FORD, INC., a California LAW CASES, UNRELATED VEHICLE
15 Corporation dba CERRITOS FORD DEFECTS, AND UNRELATED
LINCOLN; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a RECALLS AND SERVICE
16 BULLETINS
Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through
17 10, inclusive, Date Filed: March 26, 2020
Trial Date: April 3, 2023
18 Defendants
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 Plaintiffs JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS MARTINEZ (“Plaintiffs”) submits the
28 following Opposition to Defendant’s Motion in Limine No 2.
-1-
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2
Document Filed Date
March 08, 2023
Case Filing Date
March 26, 2020
Category
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.