arrow left
arrow right
  • JAIME MARTINEZ, ET AL. VS CERRITOS FORD, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DBA CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN, ET AL. Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JAIME MARTINEZ, ET AL. VS CERRITOS FORD, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DBA CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN, ET AL. Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/08/2023 07:06 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Lopez,Deputy Clerk KNIGHT LAW GROUP, LLP 1 Deepak Devabose (SBN 298890) 2 deepakd@knightlaw.com 10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 2500 3 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Tel.: (310) 552-2250 4 Fax: (310) 552-7973 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 6 JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS MARTINEZ 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 8 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 9 10 JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS Case No.: 20STCV12160 MARTINEZ, 11 Assigned to: Hon. Bruce G. Iwasaki Plaintiffs, Dept. 58 12 PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO vs. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE 13 NO. 2 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND 14 ARGUMENT OF OTHER LEMON CERRITOS FORD, INC., a California LAW CASES, UNRELATED VEHICLE 15 Corporation dba CERRITOS FORD DEFECTS, AND UNRELATED LINCOLN; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a RECALLS AND SERVICE 16 BULLETINS Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 17 10, inclusive, Date Filed: March 26, 2020 Trial Date: April 3, 2023 18 Defendants 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Plaintiffs JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS MARTINEZ (“Plaintiffs”) submits the 28 following Opposition to Defendant’s Motion in Limine No 2. -1- PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2