On March 26, 2020 a
Reply - REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9 TO PROHIBIT AND EXCLUDE ARGUMENT AND TESTIMONY THAT FORD HAD AN AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO REPURCHASE OR REPLACE PLAINTIFFS VEHICLE
was filed
involving a dispute between
Martinez Jaime,
Martinez Phyllis,
and
Cerritos Ford Inc Dba Cerritos Ford Lincoln,
Ford Motor Company,
for Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/14/2023 07:00 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Willis,Deputy Clerk
1 Michael D. Mortenson, State Bar No. 247758
mmortenson@mortensontaggart.com
2 Craig A. Taggart, State Bar No. 239168
ctaggart@mortensontaggart.com
3 Denetta E.J. Scott, State Bar No. 236899
dscott@mortensontaggart.com
4 MORTENSON TAGGART ADAMS LLP
300 Spectrum Center Drive, Suite 1200
5 Irvine, CA 92618
Telephone: (949) 774-2224
6 Facsimile: (949) 774-2545
7 Attorneys for Defendants
FORD MOTOR COMPANY AND
8 CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN
9
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
11
12 JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS Case No. 20STCV12160
MARTINEZ, Hon. Bruce G. Iwasaki
13 Dept. 58
Plaintiffs,
14
vs. DEFENDANTS FORD MOTOR
15 COMPANY’S AND CERRITOS FORD
CERRITOS FORD, INC., a California LINCOLN’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
16 Corporation dba CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN; MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9 TO
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware PROHIBIT AND EXCLUDE
17 corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ARGUMENT AND TESTIMONY
THAT FORD HAD AN
18 Defendants. AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO
REPURCHASE OR REPLACE
19 PLAINTIFFS’ VEHICLE
20
Date: March 21, 2023
21 Time: 9:00 a.m.
Dept.: 58
22
23 Complaint Filed: March 26, 2020
Jury Trial Date: April 3, 2023
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9
Document Filed Date
March 14, 2023
Case Filing Date
March 26, 2020
Category
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/14/2023 07:00 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Willis,Deputy Clerk 1 Michael D. Mortenson, State Bar No. 247758 mmortenson@mortensontaggart.com 2 Craig A. Taggart, State Bar No. 239168 ctaggart@mortensontaggart.com 3 Denetta E.J. Scott, State Bar No. 236899 dscott@mortensontaggart.com 4 MORTENSON TAGGART ADAMS LLP 300 Spectrum Center Drive, Suite 1200 5 Irvine, CA 92618 Telephone: (949) 774-2224 6 Facsimile: (949) 774-2545 7 Attorneys for Defendants FORD MOTOR COMPANY AND 8 CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 11 12 JAIME MARTINEZ and PHYLLIS Case No. 20STCV12160 MARTINEZ, Hon. Bruce G. Iwasaki 13 Dept. 58 Plaintiffs, 14 vs. DEFENDANTS FORD MOTOR 15 COMPANY’S AND CERRITOS FORD CERRITOS FORD, INC., a California LINCOLN’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 16 Corporation dba CERRITOS FORD LINCOLN; MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9 TO FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware PROHIBIT AND EXCLUDE 17 corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ARGUMENT AND TESTIMONY THAT FORD HAD AN 18 Defendants. AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO REPURCHASE OR REPLACE 19 PLAINTIFFS’ VEHICLE 20 Date: March 21, 2023 21 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: 58 22 23 Complaint Filed: March 26, 2020 Jury Trial Date: April 3, 2023 24 25 26 27 28 -1- DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 9