arrow left
arrow right
  • NATIONWIDE INDEMNITY COMPANY VS THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY Insurance Coverage (not complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • NATIONWIDE INDEMNITY COMPANY VS THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY Insurance Coverage (not complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/26/2020 02:28 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Clifton,Deputy Clerk 20STCV07937 Assigned for all purposes to: Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Judicial Officer: Barbara Meiers 1 Albert K. Alikin (SBN 265119) aalikin@goldbergsegalla.com 2 Landon J. Greene (SBN 318575) lgreene@goldbergsegalla.com 3 GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP 777 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 2000 4 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: 213.415.7200 5 Facsimile: 213.415.7299 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff NATIONWIDE INDEMNITY COMPANY 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 Case No. CaseNumber 11 NATIONWIDE INDEMNITY COMPANY, COMPLAINT FOR: 12 Plaintiff, 1. BREACH OF CONTRACT 13 v. 2. EQUITABLE CONTRIBUTION 777 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 2000 14 THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY; 3. DECLARATORY RELIEF and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Los Angeles, CA 90017 15 Goldberg Segalla LLP 213.415.7200 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Nationwide Indemnity Company (“Nationwide” or “Plaintiff”), alleges as follows: 19 PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 20 1. Plaintiff Nationwide is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the 21 State of Ohio, and is and was at all times mentioned herein qualified to do business in California. 22 2. Nationwide is informed and believes, and on such bases alleges, that at all times 23 mentioned herein, defendant The Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers” or “Defendant”) is a 24 corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut, and is and was 25 qualified to do business in California. 26 3. Nationwide is informed and believes, and on such bases alleges, that at all times 27 mentioned herein, Wismer & Becker Contracting Engineers (“Wismer & Becker”) was a 28 corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, and was qualified to 30 PLAINTIFF NATIONWIDE’S COMPLAINT 31 24541663.v1