arrow left
arrow right
  • SAMUEL HOWELL VS MALIBU COUNTRY MART, A BUSINESS ENTITY DOING BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SAMUEL HOWELL VS MALIBU COUNTRY MART, A BUSINESS ENTITY DOING BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/25/2019 06:49 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by D. Ramos,Deputy Clerk 1 LAW OFFICES OF KIRK & MYERS Amit Palls, - SBN #276487 2 707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, CA 90017 3 Telephone: 213-228-2466 4 Facsimile: 603-334-7162 5 Attorney for Defendants, MALIBU COUNTRY MART and 3835 CROSS CREEK LLC 6 7 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - SPRING STREET BRANCH 11 SAMUEL HOWELL, an individual, Case No.: 19STCV39910 12 Complaint filed: November 5, 2019 13 Plaintiff Assigned to: Honorable Theresa M. Traber Dept: 4A 14 V. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 15 MALIBU COUNTRY MART, a business entity doing business in the state of California; 3835 16 CROSS CREEK LLC, a limited liability 17 company doing business in the state of California; and DOES 1 through 40, Inclusive, 18 Defelidarils 19 Defendants, MALIBU COUNTRY MART and 3835 CROSS CREEK, LLC in answer to the 20 unverified Complaint on file herein, and by virtue of the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 21 431.30, now files its general denial to said unverified Complaint and to each cause of action thereof and 22 , answering all of the allegations thereof; Defendants deny each and all of them. Defendants further 23 specifically deny that Plaintiff has been damaged in any sum or sums whatsoever, or at all. 24 Defendants state the following separate affirmative defenses to this action: 25 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 26 1. As to each and every cause of action alleged in the Complaint herein, Defendants are 27 inforrned and believe(s) and thereon alleges that any and all alleged events, happenings, injuries and 28 damages, if any, were proximately caused or contributed to by the failure of Plaintiff to exercise -1- ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Samuel Howell v. Malibu Country Mart, et al.