On April 06, 2020 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Lloyd Joseph,
and
Magic Mountain Llc Dba Six Flags Magic Mountain A California Corporation,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
CM-015
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) FOR COURT USE ONLY
Jason W. Kearnaghan, SBN 207707 Natasha L. Domek, SBN 314589 Elyssa Sternberg, SBN
329481
| Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP
333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-1422
FILED
Superior Court of Califomia
TELEPHONE NO. 213-620-1780 County of Los Angeles
FAX NO, (Optiona): 213-620-1398
jkearnaghan@sheppardmullin.com, ndomek@sheppardmullin.com,
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional)
esternberg@sheppardmullin.com JUN 05 2020
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Magic Mountain, LLC Sherr!R,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
Xe OficerClerk of Cour
STREET ADDRESS: 312 North Spring Street Kristina Var
MAILING ADDRESS: 312 North Spring Street
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Spring Street Courthouse
CASE NUMBER
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Joseph Lloyd 20STCV13563
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Magic Mountain, LLC JUDICIAL OFFICER:
Hon. Ann Jones
DEPT.
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE 1
Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above.
1 a Title: Brittany Hamilton v. Magic Mountain, LLC
b. Case number: 19STCV33422
c. Court: X] same as above
oO other state or federal court (name and address):
Department: 10
Case type: L] limited civil EX] unlimited civil [1] probate oO family law (] other (specify).
Filing date: September 20, 2019
Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" & Yes CL] No
Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check ail that apply):
X involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims.
x arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of
the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.
Oo involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property
Xl is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges.
Oo Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h
Status of case:
X pending
oO dismissed [] with Os without prejudice
Oo disposed of by judgment
Title
Case number:
Court: [] same as above
Oo other state or federal court (name and address).
d Department:
SMRH:4813-6177-7853.1 -l-
Document Filed Date
June 05, 2020
Case Filing Date
April 06, 2020
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Stipulated Judgment - Before Trial 12/13/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.