arrow left
arrow right
  • JOSEPH LLOYD VS MAGIC MOUNTAIN, LLC Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JOSEPH LLOYD VS MAGIC MOUNTAIN, LLC Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) FOR COURT USE ONLY Jason W. Kearnaghan, SBN 207707 Natasha L. Domek, SBN 314589 Elyssa Sternberg, SBN 329481 | Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP 333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-1422 FILED Superior Court of Califomia TELEPHONE NO. 213-620-1780 County of Los Angeles FAX NO, (Optiona): 213-620-1398 jkearnaghan@sheppardmullin.com, ndomek@sheppardmullin.com, E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional) esternberg@sheppardmullin.com JUN 05 2020 ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Magic Mountain, LLC Sherr!R, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles Xe OficerClerk of Cour STREET ADDRESS: 312 North Spring Street Kristina Var MAILING ADDRESS: 312 North Spring Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Spring Street Courthouse CASE NUMBER PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Joseph Lloyd 20STCV13563 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Magic Mountain, LLC JUDICIAL OFFICER: Hon. Ann Jones DEPT. NOTICE OF RELATED CASE 1 Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1 a Title: Brittany Hamilton v. Magic Mountain, LLC b. Case number: 19STCV33422 c. Court: X] same as above oO other state or federal court (name and address): Department: 10 Case type: L] limited civil EX] unlimited civil [1] probate oO family law (] other (specify). Filing date: September 20, 2019 Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" & Yes CL] No Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check ail that apply): X involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. x arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. Oo involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property Xl is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. Oo Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h Status of case: X pending oO dismissed [] with Os without prejudice Oo disposed of by judgment Title Case number: Court: [] same as above Oo other state or federal court (name and address). d Department: SMRH:4813-6177-7853.1 -l-