arrow left
arrow right
  • PHENG PORT, ET AL. VS MELISSA LOUISE SMITH, ET AL. Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • PHENG PORT, ET AL. VS MELISSA LOUISE SMITH, ET AL. Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stere 8er numaer, end address) FOR COURT USE ONLY Otto L. Hasclhoff, Esq. (SBN 190146) I.A W OITICF S OI OTTO L. I IASEI.I IOIT, P.C. 201 Wilshire Blvd., 2nd Floor Santa Monica, CA 90401 TELEPHONE NO.: (800) 667- 1 880 FAx No. (Opt(one(i: (800) 667-099 1 E-MAIL ADDREss (optfoneii: OttONOlhpC.COm ATToRNEY FQR(n me&: Plaintiff(s) PHENG PORT and CASSANDRA PORT sUPERIoR coURT oF GALIFoRNIA, coUNTY oF Los Angeles BTREETADDREss: 312 North Spring Street MAILING ADDREss. 312 NOrth Spring Street cITY AND zip coDE: Los Angeles 900 1 2 BRANGH NAME'. Spring Street Courthouse CASE NUMBER PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: PORT 20STCV22217 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: SMITH JUDICIAL OFFICER: Hon. Kristin S. Escalante DEPT NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, ell cases related to the case referenced above. a. Title: BEAL v. SMITH b. Case number: 20STCV21828 c. Court: ~v'ame as above other state or federal court (name end address): Electronically Received 07/30/2020 09:54 AM d. Department: e. Case type: ~ 27 limited civil 06/09/2020 ~/ unlimited civil ~ probate ~ family law ~ other (specify): f. Filing date: g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. i. ~ Status of case: Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h pending dismissed ~ disposed of by judgment with ~ without prejudice 2. a. Title: PORT v. SMITH b. Case number: 20STCV22217 c. Court ~v'ame as above other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: 29 Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE vranv.cour(mfa.ca.gov CM-015 IRev. July 1, 2007I