arrow left
arrow right
  • MARIA RAMOS VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARIA RAMOS VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/26/2023 02:01 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by D. Jones,Deputy Clerk 1 LEHRMAN, VILLEGAS, CHINERY & DOUGLAS, LLP KATE S. LEHRMAN [Bar No. 123050] 2 DANIEL R. VILLEGAS [Bar No. 159935] BRADLEY RANKELL [Bar No. 321831] 3 12121 Wilshire Boulevard 4 Suite 1300 Los Angeles, CA 90025 5 (310) 917-4500 (310) 917-5677 (FAX) 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant KIA AMERICA, INC. (formerly known as 8 KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC.) 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT 12 13 MARIA RAMOS, ) Case No. 20STCV00331 ) [Filed: January 06, 2020] 14 ) Plaintiff, ) 15 ) Hon. Barbara A. Meiers v. ) Dept. 12 16 ) KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. a California ) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND 17 ) AUTHORITIES OF DEFENDANT KIA Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, ) AMERICA, INC. IN OPPOSITION TO 18 inclusive, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. ) ) 13 TO PRECLUDE ARGUMENT THAT 19 Defendants. VEHICLE INSURANCE AND ) ) REGISTRATION INCURRED AFTER 20 THE VEHICLE QUALIFIED FOR A ) ) REPURCHASE ARE NOT 21 RECOVERABLE UNDER THE SONG- ) ) BEVERLY ACT, OR ARE OTHERWISE 22 THE STANDARD COSTS OF ) ) OWNERSHIP 23 ) 24 ) DISCOVERY CUT-OFF: 01/23/23 ) MOTION CUT-OFF: 02/06/23 25 ) TRIAL DATE: 02/21/23 26 Defendant Kia America, Inc. (formerly known as Kia Motors America, Inc., hereinafter 27 KA or Defendant) respectfully submits the following Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In 28 Opposition To Plaintiff’s Motion In Limine No. 13 To Preclude Argument That Vehicle {301.209. - 00774508.DOC} 1 20STCV00331 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES OF DEFENDANT KIA AMERICA, INC. IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 13 TO PRECLUDE ARGUMENT THAT VEHICLE INSURANCE AND REGISTRATION INCURRED AFTER THE VEHICLE QUALIFIED FOR A REPURCHASE ARE NOT RECOVERABLE UNDER THE SONG-BEVERLY ACT, OR ARE OTHERWISE THE STANDARD COSTS OF OWNERSHIP