On August 10, 2020 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Chet Needelman Trustee Of The Needelman #1 Revocable Intervivos Trust,
Michael Bennett Trustee Of The Bennett Living Trust U A 3 12 92,
Hamilton John,
and
Bennett Michael,
Doe 1 Needleman,
Doe 2 Bennett,
Needleman Chet,
for Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/22/2021 11:30 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
STEVEN E. BURTON, ESQ. 93590
SPECIALE & BURTON, APC
21243 VENTURA BLVD., SUITE 210
WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364
TELEPHONE NO.: (818) 884-8525 FAX NO.(Optional): (818) 884-0806
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): sburton@speciale-burton.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendant Needelman and Bennett
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 111 NORTH HILL STREET
MAILING ADDRESS:
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
CITY AND ZIP CODE:
BRANCH NAME:CENTRAL DISTRICT
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: JOHN HAMILTON
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DOE 1 NEEDELMAN, DOE 2 BENNETT
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): ‰
X UNLIMITED CASE ‰ LIMITED CASE 20STCV30203
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: APRIL 9, 2021 Time: 8:30 AM Dept.: 26 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
‰
X Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): STEVEN E. BURTON
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. ‰ X This statement is submitted by party (name): DEFENDANTS, MICHAEL BENNETT AND CHET NEEDELMAN
b. ‰ This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. ‰ The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. ‰ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. ‰ The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) ‰ have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) ‰ have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) ‰ have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. ‰ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and the date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
‰
X complaint ‰ cross-complaint
a. Type of case in (Describe, including causes of action):
1. Breach of Contract Damages; 2. Foreclosure Mechanic's Lien;
3. Violation of Business & Prof. Code Section 17200
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
rules 3.720-3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
BENNETT
Document Filed Date
March 22, 2021
Case Filing Date
August 10, 2020
Category
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 11/23/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.