Motion-Secondary: MALIK SHAKUR VS MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, ET AL.

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/06/2021 05:23 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by W. Moore,Deputy Clerk




                     1 Steven R. Yee (SBN 155671)
                       William G. Sorkin (SBN 317652)
                     2 YEE & ASSOCIATES
                       3452 East Foothill Boulevard, Suite 1000
                     3 Pasadena, California 91107-6033
                       Telephone: (626) 449-8000
                     4 Facsimile: (626) 449-8009
                     5 Attorneys for Defendants TDI PROPERTIES, INC., MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, JOSE
                       CABRERA SANTOS, KAREN KASHANIAN (erroneously sued as “ KAREN
                     6 KANZABEDIAN” ), and 3236 60TH STREET, LP
                     7
                     8                                 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                     9                                              FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
                   10 MALIK SHAICUR,                                                                         CASE NO. 20STCV29729
                   11                                      Plaintiff,                                        [Assigned to The Hon. Christopher Lui,
                                                                                                             Dept. 76]
                   12
                                      vs.                                                            )
                   13                                        Action Filed : August 5, 2020           )
                      MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, JOSE CABRERA                                                 )
                   14 SANTOS, TDI PROPERTIES, INC., KAREN ) DEFENDANTS TDI PROPERTIES, INC.,
                      KANZABEDIAN, and DOES 1 through 100, ) MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, JOSE CABRERA
                   15 inclusive,                           ) SANTOS, KAREN KASHANIAN, AND
                                                           ) 3236 60TH STREET, LP’ S OBJECTION
                   16                                      ) TO PLAINTIFF’ S UNTIMELY REQUEST
                                     Defendants.           ) FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING
                   17                                        ON DEFENDANTS’ DEMURRER AND
                                                             OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
                   18                                        DEMURRER
                   19                                                                                        Date:   October 6, 2021
                                                                                                     )       Time: 8:30 a.m .
                   20
                                                                                                             Dept.: 76
                   21                                                                                        RES ID: 762818223602

                   22 TO ALL PARITES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
                   23                 Defendants TDI PROPERTIES, INC. (hereinafter “ TDI” ), MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, JOSE

                   24 CABRERA SANTOS, KAREN KASHANIAN, and 3236 60TH STREET, LP (hereinafter
                   25 “ defendants” ) object to plaintiff MALIK SHAKUR’ s (hereinafter “ plaintiff ’) untimely opposition
                   26 and request for a continuance of the hearing on defendants’ demurrer which is scheduled for

                   27 October 6, 2021 in the above-entitled Court.
                   28 Ill

                                                                                                    - J_ -
                                 DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF’ S UNTIMELY REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE
                                  HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ DEMURRER AND OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ DEMURRER