arrow left
arrow right
  • MALIK SHAKUR VS MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, ET AL. Other Non-Personal Injury/Property Damage tort (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MALIK SHAKUR VS MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, ET AL. Other Non-Personal Injury/Property Damage tort (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/11/2022 04:01 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Gregg,Deputy Clerk 1 Steven R. Yee (SBN 155671) William G. Sorkin (SBN 317652) 2 YEE & ASSOCIATES 3452 East Foothill Boulevard, Suite 1000 3 Pasadena, California 91107-6033 4 Telephone: (626) 449-8000 Facsimile: (626) 449-8009 5 Attorneys for Defendants TDI PROPERTIES, INC., MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, JOSE 6 CABRERA SANTOS , KAREN KASHANIAN (erroneously sued as “ KAREN KANZABEDIAN” ), and 3236 60TH STREET, LP 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 MALIK SHAKUR, ) CASE NO. 20STCV29729 11 ) Plaintiff, ) [Assigned to The Hon. Christopher Lui, 12 vs. | Dept . 76] 13 ) Action Filed : August 5, 2020 14 MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, JOSE CABRERA SANTOS, TDI PROPERTIES, INC., KAREN ) DEFENDANTS ’ NOTICE OF RULING AT 15 KANZABEDIAN, and DOES 1 through 100, ) CONTINUED CASE MANAGEMENT inclusive, ) CONFERENCE AND ON DEFENDANTS’ 16 ) MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 17 Defendants. j PLEADINGS 18 ) Trial Date: None ) 19 ) 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN: 22 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on March 9, 2022 at 8:30 a. m. in Department “ 76” 23 of the above-entitled Court, the continued case management conference and hearing on 24 defendants TDI PROPERTIES, INC., MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, JOSE CABRERA SANTOS, 25 KAREN KASHANIAN (erroneously sued as “ KAREN KANZABEDIAN” ), and 3236 60TH 26 STREET, LP ’ s (hereinafter “ defendants” ) motion for judgment on the pleadings went forward as 27 scheduled. William G. Sorkin appeared via videoconference on behalf of defendant. Plaintiff 28 MALIK SHAKUR pro per (hereinafter “ plaintiff ’) appeared telephonically . -j _- DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF RULING AT CONTINUED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS