On August 24, 2020 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bradford Stephanie,
and
Does 1-25 Inclusive,
Sina Julie,
University Of California Regents,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/08/2021 06:30 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by W. Moore,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
CAROLINA BRAVO-KARIMI (259409) / ELVIRA CORTEZ (275626)
Wilson Turner Kosmo LLP
402 West Broadway, Suite 1600
San Diego, CA 92101
TELEPHONE NO.: 619-236-9600 FAX NO. (Optional): 619-236-9669
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ecortez@wilsonturnerkosmo.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendant Regents of The University of California
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Stephanie Bradford
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Regents of The University of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 20STCV32223
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: January 20, 2021 Time: 8:45 a.m. Dept.: 52 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Elvira Cortez
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendant Regents of The University of California
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Plaintiff alleges: 1. Discrimination [Gov. Code §12940(a)], 2. Harassment on the Basis of Race [Gov. Code §12940 (j)];
3. Failure to Prevent Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation [Gov. Code §12940(k)], and 4. Constructive Termination
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov