On July 15, 2020 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
and
City Of Los Angeles Parking Violations Bureau,
for Parking Appeal (Limited Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PARKING ADJUDICATION DIVISION
HEARING EXAMINER REPORT/NOTICE OF DECISION
AMANDA TOAN Hearing Location: Civic Center
3912 LAUREL CANYON BLVD 211
STUDIO CITY, CA 91604 @
Witnesses: J 8’ g,/A. Exhibits: « :
None 5 Citation
/ Google Ma s
4/ Photos p
f Statement Of Rights
OM, Written Statement
Hearing Examiner Decision:
RefundAmt
4510237502 01/30/2020 LIABLE 93.00 iimo
Total Fine Amount: $93.00
Total Refund Amount Authorized: $0.00
Total Amount Reduced: $0.00
Total Amount Now Due: $93.00
Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69(a), "Stopping or Standing Prohibited", states, "Whenever authorized
signs are in place giving notice that stopping or standing is prohibited during such hours or on such days as are
indicated on such signs, it shall be unlawful for any person to stop or stand or park any vehicle at any time during
such hours or such days."
In determining the outcome of a disputed citation, Hearing Examiners must follow the applicable law, most of which
is contained in the California Vehicle Code and the Los Angeles Municipal Code. Section 40202(a) of the California
Vehicle Code sets forth that the information required on a Notice of Parking Violation shall be considered a "record
kept in the ordinary course of business" and "shall be prima facie evidence of the facts contained therein."
_ ‘ Essentially, a complete citation establishes the facts listed upon it, without requiring‘ the testimony of a Traic
Officer to verify it. A Respondent may introduce evidence rebutting certain facts on the citation, or establishing a
defense or the presence of extenuating circumstances; these need not necessarily contradict facts recited on the
citation. Hearing Examiners will assess all evidence and make a decision based on a "preponderance of evidence."
lefé
Examination of this citation indicates that the Department has established its prima facie case; all the required
information is present. According to the citation, on 1/30/2020, at 5:08 P.M., at approximately 400 S. Crescent
Heights Blvd., Respondent's vehicle was cited for a "No Stopping" violation. On 4/30/2020, Respondent participated
in a telephonic hearing to contest this citation.
Witness Testimony: Respondent testified that she works near the location of the citation and, as such, is familiar
with parking regulations in the area. She indicated that she parked on a section of the street which only had a posted
‘ street cleaning restriction. Respondent acknowledged that another section of the street pertained to the "No
i Stopping" restriction for which she was cited. Respondent submitted photos of the location and contested this
citation.
Document Filed Date
July 15, 2020
Case Filing Date
July 15, 2020
Category
Parking Appeal (Limited Jurisdiction)
Status
Court Finding - After Court Trial
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.