On August 19, 2020 a
Miscellaneous
was filed
involving a dispute between
Rendon An Individual Rusty,
and
Technology Advice Llc A Tennessee Limited Liability Company,
for Civil Rights/Discrimination (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/19/2020 09:17 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by H. Flores-Hernandez,Deputy Clerk
20STCV31676
CM-010
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Scott J. Ferrell (Bar #202091)
PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS, A Professional Corporation
4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 800, Newport Beach, CA 92660
TELEPHONE NO.: (949) 706-6464 FAX NO.:
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiffs
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
CASE NAME:
Rendon v. TechnologyAdvice, LLC, et al.
CASE NUMBER:
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation
X Unlimited Limited
(Amount (Amount Counter Joinder
JUDGE:
demanded demanded is Filed with first appearance by defendant
exceeds $25,000)
$25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) DEPT:
Items 1–6 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2).
1. Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case:
Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation
Auto (22) Breach of contract/warranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400–3.403)
Uninsured motorist (46) Rule 3.740 collections (09) Antitrust/Trade regulation (03)
Other PI/PD/WD (Personal Injury/Property Other collections (09) Construction defect (10)
Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort Insurance coverage (18) Mass tort (40)
Asbestos (04) Other contract (37) Securities litigation (28)
Product liability (24) Real Property Environmental/Toxic tort (30)
Medical malpractice (45) Eminent domain/Inverse Insurance coverage claims arising from the
Other PI/PD/WD (23) condemnation (14) above listed provisionally complex case
Wrongful eviction (33) types (41)
Non-PI/PD/WD (Other) Tort
Business tort/unfair business practice (07) Other real property (26) Enforcement of Judgment
X Civil rights (08) Unlawful Detainer Enforcement of judgment (20)
Defamation (13) Commercial (31) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint
Fraud (16) Residential (32) RICO (27)
Intellectual property (19) Drugs (38) Other complaint (not specified above) (42)
Professional negligence (25) Judicial Review Miscellaneous Civil Petition
Other non-PI/PD/WD tort (35) Asset forfeiture (05)
Partnership and corporate governance (21)
Employment Petition re: arbitration award (11)
Other petition (not specified above) (43)
Wrongful termination (36) Writ of mandate (02)
Other employment (15) Other judicial review (39)
2. This case is X is not complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the
factors requiring exceptional judicial management:
a. Large number of separately represented parties d. Large number of witnesses
b. Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e. Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts
issues that will be time-consuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court
c. Substantial amount of documentary evidence f. Substantial postjudgment judicial supervision
3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): a. X monetary b. X nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief c. punitive
4. Number of causes of action (specify): One (1)
5. This case is X is not a class action suit.
6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (You may use form CM-015.)
Date: August 19, 2020
Scott J. Ferrell
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY)
NOTICE
• Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed
under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result
in sanctions.
• File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule.
• If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all
other parties to the action or proceeding.
• Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only.
Page 1 of 2
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, rules 2.30, 3.220, 3.400–3.403, 3.740;
Judicial Council of California
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Cal. Standards of Judicial Administration, std. 3.10
CM-010 [Rev. July 1, 2007] www.courtinfo.ca.gov
LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms
Category
Civil Rights/Discrimination (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 11/19/2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/19/2020 09:17 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by H. Flores-Hernandez,Deputy Clerk 20STCV31676 CM-010 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Scott J. Ferrell (Bar #202091) PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS, A Professional Corporation 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 800, Newport Beach, CA 92660 TELEPHONE NO.: (949) 706-6464 FAX NO.: ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse CASE NAME: Rendon v. TechnologyAdvice, LLC, et al. CASE NUMBER: CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation X Unlimited Limited (Amount (Amount Counter Joinder JUDGE: demanded demanded is Filed with first appearance by defendant exceeds $25,000) $25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) DEPT: Items 1–6 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2). 1. Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case: Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation Auto (22) Breach of contract/warranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400–3.403) Uninsured motorist (46) Rule 3.740 collections (09) Antitrust/Trade regulation (03) Other PI/PD/WD (Personal Injury/Property Other collections (09) Construction defect (10) Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort Insurance coverage (18) Mass tort (40) Asbestos (04) Other contract (37) Securities litigation (28) Product liability (24) Real Property Environmental/Toxic tort (30) Medical malpractice (45) Eminent domain/Inverse Insurance coverage claims arising from the Other PI/PD/WD (23) condemnation (14) above listed provisionally complex case Wrongful eviction (33) types (41) Non-PI/PD/WD (Other) Tort Business tort/unfair business practice (07) Other real property (26) Enforcement of Judgment X Civil rights (08) Unlawful Detainer Enforcement of judgment (20) Defamation (13) Commercial (31) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint Fraud (16) Residential (32) RICO (27) Intellectual property (19) Drugs (38) Other complaint (not specified above) (42) Professional negligence (25) Judicial Review Miscellaneous Civil Petition Other non-PI/PD/WD tort (35) Asset forfeiture (05) Partnership and corporate governance (21) Employment Petition re: arbitration award (11) Other petition (not specified above) (43) Wrongful termination (36) Writ of mandate (02) Other employment (15) Other judicial review (39) 2. This case is X is not complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the factors requiring exceptional judicial management: a. Large number of separately represented parties d. Large number of witnesses b. Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e. Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts issues that will be time-consuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court c. Substantial amount of documentary evidence f. Substantial postjudgment judicial supervision 3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): a. X monetary b. X nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief c. punitive 4. Number of causes of action (specify): One (1) 5. This case is X is not a class action suit. 6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (You may use form CM-015.) Date: August 19, 2020 Scott J. Ferrell (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY) NOTICE • Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result in sanctions. • File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule. • If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all other parties to the action or proceeding. • Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only. Page 1 of 2 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, rules 2.30, 3.220, 3.400–3.403, 3.740; Judicial Council of California CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Cal. Standards of Judicial Administration, std. 3.10 CM-010 [Rev. July 1, 2007] www.courtinfo.ca.gov LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms