arrow left
arrow right
  • 2001 THERESA FIORENTINO REVOCABLE TRUST Trust (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • 2001 THERESA FIORENTINO REVOCABLE TRUST Trust (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 3/8/2023 11:03 AM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk, By B. Gasper, Deputy Clerk MARTIN GLICKFELD, ESQ. 1 State Bar No. 95346 LAW OFFICES OF MARTIN GLICKFELD 2 2133 Lombard Street (at Fillmore) San Francisco, CA 94123 3 Telephone: (415) 441-7491 4 Facsimile: (415) 441-7493 5 SEIFER, MURKEN, DESPINA, JAMES & TEICHMAN, A Law Corporation 6 H. NATHAN JAMES State Bar No. 97064 7 2131 Lombard Street (at Fillmore) San Francisco, CA 94121 8 Telephone: (415) 749-5900 Facsimile: (415) 749-0344 9 Attorneys for Petitioner Marcelle Broomall 10 SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 12 13 In re: The 2001 Theresa Fiorentino Revocable Case No.: 20STPB06381 Trust 14 PETITIONER MARCELLE BROOMALL’S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF 15 MARCELLE BROOMALL, trustee of the 2001 POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN Theresa Fiorentino Revocable Trust, OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENTS’ NOTICE 16 Petitioner, OF MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE 17 PETITIONER’S AMENDED PETITION vs. 18 STEPHANIE FIORENTINO CORVINO; Hearing Date: March 22, 2023 19 ALEXANDRIA FIORENTINO, DENEANE Time: 1:30 pm STEVENSON, HECTOR RIVERA, VIKRAM Dept.: 5 20 BRAR and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 21 Respondents. Hearing date reserved by Department 5 22 23 Respondents have attempted to improperly “shoe-horn” a special motion to strike under 24 CCP section 425.16 into a motion to strike under CCP section 436. 25 An antiSLAPP motion brought under section 425.16 is a “special” motion to strike. It is 26 brought by a party who seeks a dismissal of an entire compliant or cause of action, as to him or 27 her, based on the contention that the activity which provides the basis for the complaint or cause 28 of action is “protected”. The intention of such a motion is to dismiss a claim or cause of action 1 PETITIONER MARCELLE BROOMALL’S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENTS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE PETITIONER’S AMENDED PETITION