arrow left
arrow right
  • GONZALEZ RAUL, ET AL. VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • GONZALEZ RAUL, ET AL. VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 85 20STCV31864 August 25, 2020 GONZALEZ RAUL, et al. vs COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 8:30 AM Judge: Honorable James C. Chalfant CSR: L.Rouly, CSR # 9524 (Pro Tempore) Judicial Assistant: J. De Luna ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: C. Del Rio Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): Roger Jon Diamond, Esq. (Telephonic) For Defendant(s): County of Los Angeles By: Jason H. Tokoro (Telephone); Ed Morrissey (Telephonic); Amnon Z. Siegel (Telephonic) NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Ex Parte Application of Plaintiff For Temporary Restraining Order and Order To Show Cause Re Preliminary Injunction Pursuant to Government Code sections 68086, 70044, California Rules of Court, rule 2.956, and the stipulation of appearing parties, Lisa S. Rouly, CSR #9524, certified shorthand reporter is appointed as an official Court reporter pro tempore in these proceedings, and is ordered to comply with the terms of the Court Reporter Agreement. The Order is signed and filed this date. The matter is called for hearing. The court having fully considered the arguments of all parties, both written and oral, as well as the evidence presented, now rules as follows: The ex parte application is denied for the following reasons: 1. There are no evidentiary facts to support irreparable harm. 2. There is no procedural due process violation. Defendant is to give notice. Minute Order Page 1 of 1