On August 28, 2020 a
Miscellaneous
was filed
involving a dispute between
Encore Flight Corporation,
Exodus Air Service Corp,
Maisch Michael Emerson,
Nickson'S Machine Shop Incorporated Dba Nicksons Machine,
Paiz Juan Antonio,
Galynsky Elliott,
Novak Nikolai,
and
Active Magnetic Inspection Inc.,
Aero Accessories Inc.,
Aircraft Crankcase Repair A Business Organization Form Unknown Doe 1,
Aircraft Specialties Services,
Avco Corporation Dba Lycoming Engines,
Divco Inc.,
Encore Flight Corporation,
Engine Components International Inc.,
Exodus Air Service Corp,
Kps Airmotive Inc.,
Maisch Michael Emerson,
Nickson'S Machine Shop Incorporated,
Nickson'S Machine Shop Incorporated Dba Nicksons Machine,
Paiz Juan Antonio,
Superior Air Parts Inc.,
for Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/28/2020 04:58 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by C. Monroe,Deputy Clerk
20STCV33006
CM-010
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
TELEPHONE NO.: FAX NO.:
ATTORNEY FOR (Name):
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
STREET ADDRESS:
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE:
BRANCH NAME:
CASE NAME:
Galynsky, et. al. v Paiz, et. al.
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation
CASE NUMBER:
Unlimited Limited
(Amount (Amount Counter Joinder
JUDGE:
demanded demanded is Filed with first appearance by defendant
exceeds $25,000) $25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) DEPT:
Items 1–6 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2).
1. Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case:
Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation
Auto (22) Breach of contract/warranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400–3.403)
Uninsured motorist (46) Rule 3.740 collections (09) Antitrust/Trade regulation (03)
Other PI/PD/WD (Personal Injury/Property Other collections (09) Construction defect (10)
Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort Insurance coverage (18) Mass tort (40)
Asbestos (04) Other contract (37) Securities litigation (28)
Product liability (24) Real Property Environmental/Toxic tort (30)
Medical malpractice (45) Eminent domain/Inverse Insurance coverage claims arising from the
Other PI/PD/WD (23) condemnation (14) above listed provisionally complex case
Wrongful eviction (33) types (41)
Non-PI/PD/WD (Other) Tort
Business tort/unfair business practice (07) Other real property (26) Enforcement of Judgment
Civil rights (08) Unlawful Detainer Enforcement of judgment (20)
Defamation (13) Commercial (31) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint
Fraud (16) Residential (32) RICO (27)
Intellectual property (19) Drugs (38) Other complaint (not specified above) (42)
Professional negligence (25) Judicial Review Miscellaneous Civil Petition
Other non-PI/PD/WD tort (35) Asset forfeiture (05)
Partnership and corporate governance (21)
Employment Petition re: arbitration award (11)
Other petition (not specified above) (43)
Wrongful termination (36) Writ of mandate (02)
Other employment (15) Other judicial review (39)
2. This case is is not complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the
factors requiring exceptional judicial management:
a. Large number of separately represented parties d. Large number of witnesses
b. Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e. Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts
issues that will be time-consuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court
c. Substantial amount of documentary evidence f. Substantial postjudgment judicial supervision
3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): a. monetary b. nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief c. punitive
4. Number of causes of action (specify): 12; Negl.; prof. negl; breach of K; NIED; products liability; warranties
5. This case is is not a class action suit.
6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (You may use form CM-015.)
Date: August 28, 2020
Michael Elkin
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY)
NOTICE
• Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed
under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result
in sanctions.
• File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule.
• If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all
other parties to the action or proceeding.
• Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only.
Page 1 of 2
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Cal. Rules of Court, rules 2.30, 3.220, 3.400–3.403, 3.740;
Cal. Standards of Judicial Administration, std. 3.10
CM-010 [Rev. July 1, 2007] www.courtinfo.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
August 28, 2020
Case Filing Date
August 28, 2020
Category
Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 06/22/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.