Answer: ELLIOTT GALYNSKY, ET AL. VS JUAN ANTONIO PAIZ, ET AL.

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/10/2020 03:41 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by V. Delgadillo,Deputy Clerk

                  1     Parham Hendifar (SBN 280462)
                  2       Parham@Hendifar.com
                        LAW OFFICE OF PARHAM HENDIFAR
                  3     1880 Century Park East, Suite 815
                        Los Angeles, California 90067
                  4     Telephone: 310.948.3425
                  5     Fax: 310.362.8984

                  6     Attorney for Defendant,
                        ENCORE FLIGHT CORPORATION, a California Corporation, and
                  7     MICHAEL EMERSON MAISCH, an individual.
                  8
                                                         SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                  9
                                                                              COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
                10
                11
                        ELLIOTT GALYNSKY, an individual; NIKOLAI )                                          Case No. 20STCV33006
                12      NOVAK, an individual,                          )
                                                                       )                                    Assigned to Department 29
                13                                                     )                                    Honorable Kristin S. Escalante
                                       Plaintiffs,                     )
                14                                                     )                                    DEFENDANTS ENCORE FLIGHT
                                vs.                                    )                                    CORPORATION AND MICHAEL
                15                                                     )
                        JUAN ANTONIO PAIZ, an individual;                                                   EMERSON MAISCH’S ANSWER TO
                                                                       )
                16      MICHAEL EMERSON MAISCH, an individual; )                                            PLAINTIFFS ELLIOTT GALYNSKY AND
                        ENCORE FLIGHT CORPORATION, a California )                                           NIKOLAI NOVAK’S COMPLAINT
                17      corporation; EXODUS AIR SERVICE CORP., a )
                        California corporation; AIRCRAFT               )
                18      SPECIALTIES SERVICES, an Oklahoma              )                                    Action Filed:                      August 28, 2020
                        corporation; DIVCO, INC., a business           )                                    Trial Date:                        None set
                19      organization, form unknown; NICKSON’S          )
                        MACHINE SHOP, INCORPORATED, a                  )
                20      California corporation; KPS AIRMOTIVE, INC., a )
                        business organization, form unknown; ACTIVE )
                21      MAGNETIC INSPECTION, INC., a California        )
                        corporation; AERO ACCESSORIES, INC., a         )
                22      business organization, form unknown; ENGINE )
                        COMPONENTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a              )
                23      Texas corporation; SUPERIOR AIR PARTS,         )
                        INC., a Texas corporation; AVCO                )
                24      CORPORATION dba LYCOMING ENGINES, a )
                        Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1-100,          )
                25      inclusive, and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive,  )
                                                                       )
                26                             Defendants.             )
                27
                28


                                                                                                     1
                                                                DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER TO COMPLAINT