arrow left
arrow right
  • VICTOR QUINONES, ET AL. VS LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC ENTITY Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • VICTOR QUINONES, ET AL. VS LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC ENTITY Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/30/2021 11:14 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Guzman,Deputy Clerk 1 Eitan Yehoshua, Esq. SEN 258178 Ash Ashour, Esq. SEN 261030 2 Geima DeLany,Esq. SEN 299496 3 ASHOUR YEHOSHUA,APC 18425 Eurbank Elvd., Suite 712 4 Tarzana, CA 91356 Telephone; (818)344-2529 5 Facsimile: (888)344-4840 6 genna@ayapc.com Fee Exempt Per Gov. Code § 6103 7 Attorneys for Defendant, 8 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, a Public Entity 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 11 UNLIMITED JURISDICTION VICTOR QUINONES,an individual; CASE NO.:20STCV25773 12 YOLANDA HERNANDEZ,an individual 13 Assigned to Hon. Kristin Escalante Plaintiff, Dept. 29 14 REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S vs. 15 OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE 16 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION Date: April 7,2021 17 AUTHORITY,a public entity and DOES 1 Time: 3:30 p.m. 18 through 25, inclusive. Dept: 29 Action Filed: July 9,2019 19 Defendants FSC: December 23,2021 20 Trial: January 6,2022 21 22 Defendant hereby replies to Plaintiffs Opposition to LACMTA's Motion to Strike as 23 follows: 24 Plaintiffs Opposition to the Motion to Strike does not support the allegations of 25 negligent training, supervision or entrustment for the negligent operation of a vehicle as 26 against LACMTA. There is no dispute that LACMTA can be held liable for any negligence 27 28 REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE Page 1