arrow left
arrow right
  • WESTLAKE SERVICES, LLC  A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SAN JOSE AUTO OUTLET PLUS TRUCKS, INC., A CORPORATION, ET AL. Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • WESTLAKE SERVICES, LLC  A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SAN JOSE AUTO OUTLET PLUS TRUCKS, INC., A CORPORATION, ET AL. Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 JOSHUA P. FRIEDMAN, S.B. #216261 JOSHUA P. FRIEDMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2 23679 CALABASAS ROAD #377 CALABASAS, CA 91302 3 TELEPHONE: (310) 278-8600 FACSIMILE: (310) 388-5421 4 Attorney for Plaintiff, 5 Westlake Services, LLC 6 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7 LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CENTRAL DISTRICT 8 Westlake Services, LLC, ) Case No.: 20STCV45418 9 ) Plaintiff, ) SUMMARY OF CASE PURSUANT TO ) CAL RULES OF COURT, RULE 10 ) 3.1800(A)(1) vs. ) 11 ) San Jose Auto Outlet Plus Trucks, Inc., et al., ) 12 ) ) 13 Defendants. ) ) 14 15 1. Defendant San Jose Auto Outlet Plus Trucks, Inc. (“Corporate Defendant”) acts 16 an auto dealership. After selling automobiles to customers and financing the same sale, 17 Defendant would sell these loans to Plaintiff Westlake Services, LLC (“Plaintiff”). 18 2. Unfortunately, certain of these loans went bad and pursuant to the terms of the 19 contract entered into by and between Plaintiff, Corporate Defendant, and KHOSROW 20 ONBIRBACK (“Personal Guarantor”, together with Corporate Defendant, “Defendants”), 21 Defendants remained personally liable for these debts. 22 3. Therefore, based on the foregoing, Plaintiff now seeks entry of default judgment 23 in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, jointly and severally, for the sum of $41,009.10. 24 Respectfully submitted this 1/27/2021. 25 26 By: ________________________________ 27 Joshua P. Friedman Attorneys for Plaintiff 28 SUMMARY OF CASE PURSUANT TO CAL RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.1800(A)(1) -1-