On November 30, 2020 a
Judgment
was filed
involving a dispute between
Westlake Services Llc A Limited Liability Company Dba Westlake Financial Services,
and
Onbirback Khosrow,
San Jose Auto Outlet Plus Trucks Inc. A Corporation,
for Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
JUD-100
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
JOSHUA P. FRIEDMAN, ESQUIRE (S.B. #216261)
JOSHUA P. FRIEDMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
23679 CALABASAS ROAD #377
CALABASAS, CA 91302
TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 278-8600 FAX NO. (Optional): (310) 388-5421
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): JFRIEDMAN@JPFASSOCIATES.COM
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Westlake Services, LLC
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Central District - Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF: Westlake Services, LLC
DEFENDANT: San Jose Auto Outlet Plus Trucks, Inc.
JUDGMENT CASE NUMBER:
20STCV45418
By Clerk By Default After Court Trial
By Court On Stipulation Defendant Did Not
Appear at Trial
JUDGMENT
1. BY DEFAULT
a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint.
b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law.
c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application.
d. Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contract or judgment of a court of
this state for the recovery of money.
Electronically Received 01/27/2021 02:45 PM
e. Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered
(1) plaintiff's testimony and other evidence.
(2) plaintiff's written declaration (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)).
2. ON STIPULATION
a. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be entered in this case. The court approved the stipulated
judgment and
b. the signed written stipulation was filed in the case.
c. the stipulation was stated in open court the stipulation was stated on the record.
3. AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence.
a. The case was tried on (date and time):
before (name of judicial officer):
b. Appearances by:
Plaintiff (name each): Plaintiff's attorney (name each):
(1) (1)
(2) (2)
Continued on Attachment 3b.
Defendant (name each): Defendant 's attorney (name each):
(1) (1)
(2) (2)
Continued on Attachment 3b.
c. Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial.
d. A statement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) was not was requested.
Page 1 of 2
Form Approved for Optional Use Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 585, 664.6
Judicial Council of California JUDGMENT
JUD-100 [New January 1, 2002]
Preview
JUD-100 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY JOSHUA P. FRIEDMAN, ESQUIRE (S.B. #216261) JOSHUA P. FRIEDMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 23679 CALABASAS ROAD #377 CALABASAS, CA 91302 TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 278-8600 FAX NO. (Optional): (310) 388-5421 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): JFRIEDMAN@JPFASSOCIATES.COM ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Westlake Services, LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Central District - Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF: Westlake Services, LLC DEFENDANT: San Jose Auto Outlet Plus Trucks, Inc. JUDGMENT CASE NUMBER: 20STCV45418 By Clerk By Default After Court Trial By Court On Stipulation Defendant Did Not Appear at Trial JUDGMENT 1. BY DEFAULT a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint. b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law. c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application. d. Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contract or judgment of a court of this state for the recovery of money. Electronically Received 01/27/2021 02:45 PM e. Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered (1) plaintiff's testimony and other evidence. (2) plaintiff's written declaration (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)). 2. ON STIPULATION a. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be entered in this case. The court approved the stipulated judgment and b. the signed written stipulation was filed in the case. c. the stipulation was stated in open court the stipulation was stated on the record. 3. AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence. a. The case was tried on (date and time): before (name of judicial officer): b. Appearances by: Plaintiff (name each): Plaintiff's attorney (name each): (1) (1) (2) (2) Continued on Attachment 3b. Defendant (name each): Defendant 's attorney (name each): (1) (1) (2) (2) Continued on Attachment 3b. c. Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial. d. A statement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) was not was requested. Page 1 of 2 Form Approved for Optional Use Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 585, 664.6 Judicial Council of California JUDGMENT JUD-100 [New January 1, 2002]