arrow left
arrow right
  • LYNN THOMPSON VS THE DIPLOMAT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL. Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • LYNN THOMPSON VS THE DIPLOMAT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL. Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/28/2022 12:42 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Panganiban,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Slate Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY CAMERON PENN FREDMAN, ESQ. 256034 FREDMAN LEGAL, P.C. 9454 WILSHIRE BLVD. PENTHOUSE BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 TELEPHONE NO.: 323 207 0275 FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): CAM@FREDMANLEGAL.COM ATTORNEY FOR /Name): CROSS-COMPLAINANT BERNALYNN WARNER SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 NORTH HILL STREET MAILING ADDRESS: SAME CITY AND ZIP CODE: LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: STANLEY MOSK PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:LYNN THOMPSON DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:THE DIPLOMAT CASE NUMBER: CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (Check one): w UNLIMITED CASE (Amount demanded 0 LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded is $25,000 20STCV33912 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: March 7, 2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 45 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): D Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. w This statement is submitted by party (name):Defendant and Cross-Complainant Berna Lynn Warner b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): September 4, 2020 b. w The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): August 20, 2021 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. w All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case [xJ complaint a. Type of case in cross-complaint w (Describe, including causes of action): THE COMPLAINT HAS SETTLED. IT AWAITS HEARING ON THE GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT MOTION CONTINUED FROM MARCH 29, 2022 TO MAY 24, 2022. THE CROSS-COMPLAINT HAS NOT SETTLED AND PROCEEDS TO TRIAL Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3. 72(}-3. 730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011]